Department of Teacher Preparation and Education Studies - Bachelor of Arts in Special Education

z-2024-2025 Catalog - PROGRAM - New Major (Step 2) - Full Proposal

completed

What can I do next?

View the Proposal

  • View changes to the proposal by clicking the Discussion tab and selecting "Show current with markup" on the User Tracking dropdown.
  • View current comments concerning this proposal by clicking the Discussion tab.
  • View the history of the proposal by clicking the Workflow Status tab.
  • View the signatures the proposal has collected by clicking the Signatures tab.
  • View the files associated with the proposal by clicking the Files tab.
  • Compare the proposal with related proposal by clicking the Proposal Lookup tab.
ACALOG REQUIRED FIELDS
  • Select Program below.  

    Shared Cores are available in Acalog for shared information in program curriculum.

  • Type of Program*
  • Status*
Determine Substantive Change Status
  • (Check all that apply)
  • Did you check any of the boxes for the statements above?*
  • If you answered Yes, this program may be a substantive change.

    Please contact the SACSCOC Liaison, Abdou Ndoye at ndoyea2@nku.edu or (859) 572-5379 for further instructions.

    For additional information about types of substantive changes, please see the document at Substantive Change Form.

BASIC INFORMATION
  • All actions in the approval of new programs for public institutions are subject to a stipulation regarding the program’s ability to attain specified goals that have been established by the institution and approved by the Council on Postsecondary Education (the Council). At the conclusion of an appropriate period of time, the program’s performance shall be reviewed by Council staff following criteria established in the Council’s Academic Programs Policy.

  • College*
  • Department*
    (e.g. Department, Division, School)
  • Program Name*
    Bachelor of Arts in Special Education
    Bachelor of Arts in Special Education
  • Degree Level*
  • Degree Designation*
  • CIP Code (for assistance with CIP Code contact the Curriculum Coordinator in Undergraduate Academic Affairs.)
  • Is this program an Advanced Practice Doctorate?*
  • Approved NOI form link
    Copy the URL (address) of the approved NOI form here
  • Proposed Implementation / Start Date*
    Fall 2024
    Fall 2024
  • Description*

    The special education major is currently paired as a double major with one of the other teacher preparation programs including elementary, middle grades, or secondary. The proposed change is to offer a single major in special education, while also keeping the double major option for those who would like to complete the double major. It really isn’t a new program, but rather a new way to package the current program to offer students a more efficient and economical path to earn a degree in special education. Currently teacher candidates must complete a double major in order to be certified in special education. The double major requirement imposes financial burdens, as well as requiring extended credit hours well beyond the 120 typically required for a Bachelor’s degree.

     

    Teacher candidates will be able to choose the single major in special education and complete 122 credit hours that include three special education practicum field placements and two 8-week clinical

    placements, one at the elementary level, and one at the secondary level, both in special education. This increases the number of hours of hands-on experiences working directly with students with disabilities and intervention specialists in the field.

     

    The estimated date of implementation is Fall term 2024.

    This Description will appear in the catalog.
  • INSTITUTIONAL CONTACT INFORMATION
  • Name of Program Director*
    1.Dr. Eileen Shanahan; 2.Dr. Melissa Jones
    1.Dr. Eileen Shanahan; 2.Dr. Melissa Jones
  • Title
    Dr. Shanahan, Dept. Chair of Teacher Prep & Educ. Studies; Dr. Jones, Professor of Special Education
    Dr. Shanahan, Dept. Chair of Teacher Prep & Educ. Studies; Dr. Jones, Professor of Special Education
  • Email Address
    shanahane1@nku.edu; jonesme@nku.edu
    shanahane1@nku.edu; jonesme@nku.edu
  • Phone Number:
    859) 572-5621; (859) 572-1423
    859) 572-5621; (859) 572-1423
  • REQUIRED CONDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR INTERNAL NKU APPROVALS

  • Undergraduate or Graduate Program?*
  • Does this proposal require TEC approval?*
OVERVIEW
  • 1. Provide a brief description of the program with its estimated date of implementation. *

    The special education major is currently paired as a double major with one of the other teacher preparation programs including elementary, middle grades, or secondary. The proposed change is to offer a single major in special education, while also keeping the double major option for those who would like to complete the double major. It really isn’t a new program, but rather a new way to package the current program to offer students a more efficient and economical path to earn a degree in special education. Currently teacher candidates must complete a double major in order to be certified in special education. The double major requirement imposes financial burdens, as well as requiring extended credit hours well beyond the 120 typically required for a Bachelor’s degree.

     

    Teacher candidates will be able to choose the single major in special education and complete 122 credit hours that include three special education practicum field placements and two 8-week clinical

    placements, one at the elementary level, and one at the secondary level, both in special education. This increases the number of hours of hands-on experiences working directly with students with disabilities and intervention specialists in the field.

     

    The estimated date of implementation is Fall term 2024.

  • Does this program have any tracks (undergraduate) or concentrations (graduate)?
  • If yes, please add at least one program track (undergraduate) or concentration (graduate) item.

    Focus on Reading: During one of the professional semesters that special education majors will be required to take, the focus will be entirely on the teaching of reading.  Teacher candidates will engage in coursework to learn the science behind reading as well as the strategies needed to teach reading and remediate reading challenges.  Simultaneously, teacher candidates will be engaged in a field experience, paired with either a reading specialist or interventionist who specializes in teaching reading, to practice and gain skills in teaching reading to struggling readers.  Progress monitoring and curriculum based assessment will be a key component of the field experience.

  • 2. Describe how the new program is consistent with the mission and goals of the institution. *

    NKU’s mission is to deliver “innovative, student-centered education” and engage in “impactful scholarly and creative endeavors, all of which empower our graduates to have fulfilling careers and meaningful lives, while contributing to the economic, civic, and social vitality of the region” (https://www.nku.edu/about/mission-and-values.html). The vision is to be student-ready and regionally engaged, empowering diverse learners for economic and social mobility.

    The single major in special education encompasses all of these aspirations, especially as we respond to our students’ requests for a single major, and our region’s need for quality special educators. The College of Education and Special Education program at NKU are highly student-centered and impactful. With the numerous field experiences and service opportunities both required and offered to teacher candidates, our candidates are well-prepared and highly sought after by school district administrators. The program not only prepares candidates for teaching through innovative approaches (e.g., school-embedded; project based learning; problem-based learning; service learning; philanthropy), but it also provides candidates with the skills and resources necessary to advocate for and have a positive impact on their students, ultimately improving the vitality of the region. These practices will continue with the implementation of a single major

  • 3. Is an approval letter from Education Professional Standards Board (EPSB) required?
  • 4. Is there a specialized accrediting agency related to this program?
  • -- If Yes, identify the accreditor.
    Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP)
    Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP)
  • -- If Yes, will accreditation be sought?
  • 5. Does this program have a clinical component?
  • -- If Yes, discuss the nature, appropriateness, and availability of clinical sites.
        1. The major will require a total of four field experience placements in P-12 schools working with students with mild to moderate disabilities including specific learning disabilities, emotional/behavioral disorders, and mild intellectual disabilities, as well as students across all grade levels since the certification will be a P-12 teaching certificate. The first three field experiences (practica) will provide teacher candidates with scaffolded and sequenced experiences working with students with disabilities under the guidance, supervision and mentorship of both a certified special educator/intervention specialist, and a university supervisor.  Each experience will require a minimum of 75 hands-on field hours at a school working with students.  The final clinical experience (student teaching) will give teacher candidate’s opportunities to independently and collaboratively practice the art and science of teaching.  During the final clinical experience, teacher candidates will spend eight weeks in an elementary special education placement, and eight weeks in a middle grades/secondary special education placement.
  • 6. Describe the rationale and need for the program to include how the institution determined need. *

    The field of education is experiencing an exodus due to a variety of social and political factors (NCES, 2022). This reality is magnified in the field of special education where the void of qualified teachers expands and we face critical shortages. The U.S. Department of Education (2021) reported that 49 states and the District of Columbia currently report teacher shortages in this field and the U.S. Labor Bureau of Statistics called the shortage acute. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, 45% of schools across the country reported they had at least one unfilled vacancy in special education last winter. The National Association of State Directors of Special Education report that the national shortage in special educators has reached epic proportions (K-12 Dive, 2023) as the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics predicted an annual need for 37,600 special educators between 2021 and 2031 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2023). This shortage is happening at a time when we are experiencing increases in the percentage of students receiving special education services nationally (Monnin, Day, Strimel, & Kasey, 2023; NEA, 2019).

     

    Data in Kentucky

     

    Kentucky has not been immune to the special education teacher shortage, reportedly being one of the top three states along with New York and California, in desperate need of special educators (Zippia, 2021). Since 2019, the Kentucky Department of Education has listed Special Education Services as an area of extreme teacher shortages (KDE, 2023). The northern Kentucky region is experiencing shortages equivalent to the rest of the state, as noted by a recent College of Education survey conducted of local school Superintendents which revealed special education as an area of high priority for teachers.

     

    Due to this void in special educators and intervention specialists, school districts have been forced to hire personnel who have not received formal training in teaching students with disabilities. Graduate alternative certification programs like the one at NKU have seen increases as a result, but these programs, although helpful in filling the void, place people without teaching qualifications in positions of responsibility for students with disabilities, long before they are credentialed to teach. Our undergraduate teacher preparation has felt the pressure from school districts to graduate more qualified teachers, and we’ve responded by allowing students in their final clinical field experience to be hired as long-term substitute teachers in order to fill empty teaching positions. Even when formal education programs are accessed to fill positions, the reality is that P-12 students with the greatest needs are being taught by those who are least qualified.

     

    The special education major is currently paired as a double major with one of the other teacher preparation programs including elementary, middle grades, or secondary. The proposed change is to offer a single major in special education, while also keeping the double major option for those who would like to complete the double major. It really isn’t a new program, but rather a new way to package the current program to offer students a more efficient and economical way to earn a degree in special education. Currently teacher candidates must complete a double major in order to be certified in special education. This requirement imposes financial burdens, as well as requiring extended credit hours well beyond the 120 typically required for a Bachelor’s degree.

     

    By having a single major in special education, the College of Education would also be able to respond to requests for an Option 9 program in special education. Option 9 provides opportunities for those currently serving as para-professionals in schools to earn their Bachelor’s degree while working in a school district (EPSB, 2023). If we were to add an Option 9 route to a Bachelor degree in special education, we would be able to positively impact the region by producing more qualified teacher candidates for hire in school districts.

     

    Specifically, Fayette County Public Schools has requested an Option 9 Cohort for their paraprofessionals. A recent survey of their para-professionals has identified over 50 people interested in this option for special education certification and degrees. There is also potential for a second cohort comprised of para-professionals across a combination of local public schools in northern Kentucky. Implementing these cohorts would increase the enrollment of NKU’s special education program exponentially and would highlight NKU as a leader in special education certification.

    Data Trends

    Regional: Regional needs for intervention specialists reflect state and national trends. This institution’s region includes not just northern Kentucky, but a tri-state region encompassing southwest Ohio and the Cincinnati area, as well as eastern Indiana.

    In the Cincinnati public schools alone, 32 intervention specialist positions were posted in May 11, 2023.

    Public school districts in northern Kentucky are also demonstrating a need for intervention specials/special education teachers, as of May 11, 2023:

    · Boone County Public Schools: 12 available positions

    · Campbell County Public Schools: 10 available positions

    · Kenton County Public Schools: 14 available positions

    · Fayette County Schools: 20 available positions

    State: 1,420 in 2020

    National: 476,300 (2021)

    Growth Projections:

    Regional: Regional needs reflect state and national projections. This institution’s region includes not just northern Kentucky, but a tri-state region which includes southwest Ohio and the Cincinnati area, as well as eastern Indiana.

    State: 5-8% increase

    National: 4% (as fast as average), with an increase in positions 20,600 by 2031. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Occupational Outlook Handbook Kentucky Center for Statistics

    School District Websites

    References

    EPSB. (2023). Option 9: Expedited Route. Division of Educator Licensure and Quality, Education Professional Standards Board. Retrieved from http://www.epsb.ky.gov/mod/page/view.php?id=506

    K-12 Dive. 2023. K-12 Dive, Retrieved from https://www.k12dive.com/news/States-tackle-special-educator-shortage/640925/#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20National%20Center,educators%20between%202021%20and%202031.

     

    KDE. (2023). Critical shortage areas, Kentucky Department of Education. Retrieved from https://education.ky.gov/pages/search.aspx?terms=special+education+teacher+shortages&affiliateId=EDUCATION

     

    Monnin, K., Day, J., Strimel, M., & Kasey, D. (2023). The special education teacher shortage: A policy analysis. Council for Exceptional Children. Retrieved from https://education.ky.gov/pages/search.aspx?terms=special+education+teacher+shortages&affiliateId=EDUCATION

     

    NCES. (2022). U.S. schools report increased teacher vacancies due to COVID-19 pandemic, new NCES data show. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/whatsnew/press_releases/3_3_2022.asp

    U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Teacher Shortage Areas. https://tsa.ed.gov/#/reports

     

    U.S. Labor Bureau of Statistics (2023. Projections for teachers: How many are leaving the occupation? Career Outlook, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2018/data-on-display/how-many-teachers-are-leaving.htm

    Zippia: The Career Expert. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.zippia.com/answers/where-is-the-highest-demand-for-special-education-teachers/

OBJECTIVES and CURRICULUM
  • The curriculum should be structured to meet the stated objectives and student learning outcomes of the program.

  • 1. Provide specific programming goals (objectives) *

    When designing the curriculum and courses for the special education major, the Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators, created by the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) are used. Student learning outcomes for the program are the CEC standards: https://exceptionalchildren.org/standards/initial-

    In the following chart, the CEC standards/student learning outcomes are paired with the courses and assignments used to assess the outcomes.

    Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators

    Standard Description UG Courses Assessment

    Field

    and

    Clinical

    Exp. Special education candidates progress through a series of developmentally sequenced field and clinical experiences for the full range of ages, types and levels of abilities, and collaborative opportunities that are appropriate to the license or roles for which they are preparing. These field and clinical experiences are supervised by qualified professionals. EDS 473 US Observation and Disposition -EDS 473 Observation and Disposition-EDS 473

    1 Engaging in Professional Learning and Practice within Ethical Guidelines: Candidates practice within ethical and legal guidelines; advocate for improved outcomes for individuals with exceptionalities and their families while considering their social, cultural, and linguistic diversity; and engage in ongoing self-reflection to design and implement professional learning activities.

    1.1

    Candidates practice within ethical guidelines and legal policies and procedures. EDS 473 Field Experience Disposition- EDS 473

    Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators

    Standard Description UG Courses Assessment

    1.2 Candidates advocate for improved outcomes for individuals with exceptionalities and their families while addressing the unique needs of those with diverse social, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds. EDS 365 EDS 570 EDS 572 Service Learning Reflection-EDS 365 Home Visit Project/ Family Support Project-EDS 570 Transition Plan – EDS 572

    1.3 Candidates design and implement professional learning activities based on ongoing analysis of student learning; self-reflection; and professional standards, research, and contemporary practices. EDS 473 Lesson Plans-EDS EDS 473

    2 Understanding and Addressing Each Individual’s Developmental and Learning Needs: Candidates use their understanding of human growth and development, the multiple influences on development, individual differences, diversity, including exceptionalities, and families and communities to plan and implement inclusive learning environments and experiences that provide individuals with exceptionalities high quality learning experiences reflective of each individual’s strengths and needs.

    2.1 Candidates apply understanding of human growth and development to create developmentally appropriate and meaningful learning experiences that address individualized strengths and needs of students with exceptionalities. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 365 RTI Project – EDS 472 Lesson Plans- EDS 473 Mayerson Student Philanthropy – EDS 365

    2.2 Candidates use their knowledge and understanding of diverse factors that influence development and learning, including differences related to families, languages, cultures, and communities, and individual differences, including exceptionalities, to plan and implement learning experiences and environments. EDS 472 EDS 570 EDS 473 RTI Project – EDS 472 Home Visit Interview Home Visit Report Family Support Project-570 Lesson Plans and Field Placement-473

    3 Demonstrating Subject Matter Content and Specialized Curricular Knowledge: Candidates apply their understanding of the academic subject matter content of the general curriculum and specialized curricula to inform their programmatic and instructional decisions for learners with exceptionalities.

    3.1 Candidates apply their understanding of academic subject matter content of the general curriculum to inform their programmatic and instructional decisions for individuals with exceptionalities. EDS 472 EDS 473 RTI Project – EDS 472 Lesson Plans and Observations-EDS 473

    3.2 Candidates augment the general education curriculum to address skills and strategies that students with disabilities need to access the core curriculum and function successfully within a variety of contexts as well as the continuum of placement options to assure specially designed instruction is developed and implemented to achieve mastery of curricular standards and individualized goals and objectives. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 572 RTI Project – EDS 472 Lesson Plans and Observations-EDS 473 Secondary Lesson Plan – 572

    Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators

    Standard Description UG Courses Assessment

    4 Using Assessment to Understand the Learner and the Learning Environment for Data-based Decision Making: Candidates assess student’s learning, behavior, and the classroom environment in order to evaluate and support classroom and school-based problem-solving systems of intervention and instruction. Candidates evaluate students to determine their strengths and needs, contribute to students’ eligibility determination, communicate students’ progress, inform short and long-term instructional planning, and make ongoing adjustments to instruction using technology as appropriate.

    4.1 Candidates collaboratively develop, select, administer, analyze, and interpret multiple measures of student learning, behavior, and the classroom environment to evaluate and support classroom and school-based systems of intervention for students with and without exceptionalities. EDS 473 EDS 362 EDS 464 Field Placement-EDS 473 BIP Report- EDS 362 Assessment Report – EDS 464

    4.2 Candidates develop, select, administer, and interpret multiple, formal and informal, culturally and linguistically appropriate measures and procedures that are valid and reliable to contribute to eligibility determination for special education services. EDS 464 Child Assessment Report

    4.3 Candidates assess, collaboratively analyze, interpret, and communicate students’ progress toward measurable outcomes using technology as appropriate, to inform both short- and long-term planning, and make ongoing adjustments to instruction. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 362 RTI Project – EDS 472 Field Placement and lesson plans- EDS 473 BIP Report – EDS 362

    5 Supporting Learning Using Effective Instruction: Candidates use knowledge of individuals’ development, learning needs, and assessment data to inform decisions about effective instruction. Candidates use explicit instructional strategies and employ strategies to promote active engagement and increased motivation to individualize instruction to support each individual. Candidates use whole group instruction, flexible grouping, small group instruction, and individual instruction. Candidates teach individuals to use meta/cognitive strategies to support and self-regulate learning.

    5.1 Candidates use findings from multiple assessments, including student self-assessment, that are responsive to cultural and linguistic diversity and specialized as needed, to identify what students know and are able to do. They then interpret the assessment data to appropriately plan and guide instruction to meet rigorous academic and non-academic content and goals for each individual. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 362 RTI Project – EDS 472 Lesson Plans and Observations-EDS 473 BIP Report – EDS 362

    5.2 Candidates use effective strategies to promote active student engagement, increase student motivation, increase opportunities to respond, and enhance self‐regulation of student learning. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 362 Self-Correcting Activity Instructional Strategy Presentation RTI Project – EDS 472 Lesson Plans Observations – EDS 473 BIP Report - 362

    5.3 Candidates use explicit, systematic instruction to teach content, strategies, and skills to make clear EDS 364 Dyslexia Assignment – EDS 364

    Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators

    Standard Description UG Courses Assessment what a learner needs to do or think about while learning. EDS 473 EDS 572 Lesson Plans and Observations- 473 Secondary Lesson Plan-572

    5.4 Candidates use flexible grouping to support the use of instruction that is adapted to meet the needs of each individual and group. EDS 473 Lesson Plans and Observations- EDS 473

    5.5 Candidates organize and manage focused, intensive small group instruction to meet the learning needs of each individual. EDS 473 RTI Project – EDS 472 Deposition, Lesson plans and Observations- EDS 473

    5.6 Candidates plan and deliver specialized, individualized instruction that is used to meet the learning needs of each individual. EDS 472 EDS 473 RTI Project – EDS 472 Disposition, Lesson plans and Observations- EDS 473

    6 Supporting Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Growth: Candidates create and contribute to safe, respectful, and productive learning environments for individuals with exceptionalities through the use of effective routines and procedures and use a range of preventive and responsive practices to support social, emotional and educational well-being. They follow ethical and legal guidelines and work collaboratively with families and other professionals to conduct behavioral assessments for intervention and program development.

    6.1 Candidates use effective routines and procedures to create safe, caring, respectful, and productive learning environments for individuals with exceptionalities. EDS 473 EDS 365 Deposition- EDS 473, Lesson Plans, Observations- EDS 473 Classroom Management Plan Lesson – EDS 365

    6.2 Candidates use a range of preventive and responsive practices documented as effective to support individuals’ social, emotional, and educational well-being. EDS 473 EDS 365 Disposition-EDS 473, Lesson Plans and Observations-EDS 473 Classroom Management Plan – EDS 365

    6.3 Candidates systematically use data from a variety of sources to identify the purpose or function served by problem behavior to plan, implement, and evaluate behavioral interventions and social skills programs, including generalization to other environments. EDS 473 EDS 362 Lesson Plans and Observations- EDS 473 BIP Project/Report – EDS 362

    7 Collaborating with Team Members: Candidates apply team processes and communication strategies to collaborate in a culturally responsive manner with families, paraprofessionals, and other professionals within the school, other educational settings, and the community to plan programs and access services for individuals with exceptionalities and their families.

    7.1 Candidates utilize communication, group facilitation, and problem–solving strategies in a culturally responsive manner to lead effective meetings and share expertise and knowledge to build team capacity EDS 322/323/324 EDS 472 IEP Handbook – EDS 322/323/324 IEP Role Play – EDS 472 PBL Community Resources Home Visit Report – EDS 570

    Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators

    Standard Description UG Courses Assessment and jointly address students’ instructional and behavioral needs. EDS 570

    7.2 Candidates collaborate, communicate, and coordinate with families, paraprofessionals, and other professionals within the educational setting to assess, plan, and implement effective programs and services that promote progress toward measurable outcomes for individuals with and without exceptionalities and their families. EDS 473 EDS 572 Disposition- EDS 473 Transition Plan - 572

    7.3 Candidates collaborate, communicate, and coordinate with professionals and agencies within the community to identify and access services, resources, and supports to meet the identified needs of individuals with exceptionalities and their families. EDS 570 EDS 572 Problem Based Learning Project Family Support Project- EDS 570 Transition Plan - 572

    7.4 Candidates work with and mentor paraprofessionals in the paraprofessionals’ role of supporting the education of individuals with exceptionalities and their families. EDS 473 Disposition Para reflection Lesson Plan/Observation EDS 473

  • 1a. Provide specific student learning outcomes for the program.
    <p>When designing the curriculum and courses for the special education major, the Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators, created by the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) are used. Student learning outcomes for the program are the CEC standards: https://exceptionalchildren.org/standards/initial-</p> <p>In the following chart, the CEC standards/student learning outcomes are paired with the courses and assignments used to assess the outcomes.</p> <p>Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators</p> <p>Standard Description UG Courses Assessment</p> <p>Field</p> <p>and</p> <p>Clinical</p> <p>Exp. Special education candidates progress through a series of developmentally sequenced field and clinical experiences for the full range of ages, types and levels of abilities, and collaborative opportunities that are appropriate to the license or roles for which they are preparing. These field and clinical experiences are supervised by qualified professionals. EDS 473 US Observation and Disposition -EDS 473 Observation and Disposition-EDS 473</p> <p>1 Engaging in Professional Learning and Practice within Ethical Guidelines: Candidates practice within ethical and legal guidelines; advocate for improved outcomes for individuals with exceptionalities and their families while considering their social, cultural, and linguistic diversity; and engage in ongoing self-reflection to design and implement professional learning activities.</p> <p>1.1</p> <p>Candidates practice within ethical guidelines and legal policies and procedures. EDS 473 Field Experience Disposition- EDS 473</p> <p>Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators</p> <p>Standard Description UG Courses Assessment</p> <p>1.2 Candidates advocate for improved outcomes for individuals with exceptionalities and their families while addressing the unique needs of those with diverse social, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds. EDS 365 EDS 570 EDS 572 Service Learning Reflection-EDS 365 Home Visit Project/ Family Support Project-EDS 570 Transition Plan &ndash; EDS 572</p> <p>1.3 Candidates design and implement professional learning activities based on ongoing analysis of student learning; self-reflection; and professional standards, research, and contemporary practices. EDS 473 Lesson Plans-EDS EDS 473</p> <p>2 Understanding and Addressing Each Individual&rsquo;s Developmental and Learning Needs: Candidates use their understanding of human growth and development, the multiple influences on development, individual differences, diversity, including exceptionalities, and families and communities to plan and implement inclusive learning environments and experiences that provide individuals with exceptionalities high quality learning experiences reflective of each individual&rsquo;s strengths and needs.</p> <p>2.1 Candidates apply understanding of human growth and development to create developmentally appropriate and meaningful learning experiences that address individualized strengths and needs of students with exceptionalities. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 365 RTI Project &ndash; EDS 472 Lesson Plans- EDS 473 Mayerson Student Philanthropy &ndash; EDS 365</p> <p>2.2 Candidates use their knowledge and understanding of diverse factors that influence development and learning, including differences related to families, languages, cultures, and communities, and individual differences, including exceptionalities, to plan and implement learning experiences and environments. EDS 472 EDS 570 EDS 473 RTI Project &ndash; EDS 472 Home Visit Interview Home Visit Report Family Support Project-570 Lesson Plans and Field Placement-473</p> <p>3 Demonstrating Subject Matter Content and Specialized Curricular Knowledge: Candidates apply their understanding of the academic subject matter content of the general curriculum and specialized curricula to inform their programmatic and instructional decisions for learners with exceptionalities.</p> <p>3.1 Candidates apply their understanding of academic subject matter content of the general curriculum to inform their programmatic and instructional decisions for individuals with exceptionalities. EDS 472 EDS 473 RTI Project &ndash; EDS 472 Lesson Plans and Observations-EDS 473</p> <p>3.2 Candidates augment the general education curriculum to address skills and strategies that students with disabilities need to access the core curriculum and function successfully within a variety of contexts as well as the continuum of placement options to assure specially designed instruction is developed and implemented to achieve mastery of curricular standards and individualized goals and objectives. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 572 RTI Project &ndash; EDS 472 Lesson Plans and Observations-EDS 473 Secondary Lesson Plan &ndash; 572</p> <p>Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators</p> <p>Standard Description UG Courses Assessment</p> <p>4 Using Assessment to Understand the Learner and the Learning Environment for Data-based Decision Making: Candidates assess student&rsquo;s learning, behavior, and the classroom environment in order to evaluate and support classroom and school-based problem-solving systems of intervention and instruction. Candidates evaluate students to determine their strengths and needs, contribute to students&rsquo; eligibility determination, communicate students&rsquo; progress, inform short and long-term instructional planning, and make ongoing adjustments to instruction using technology as appropriate.</p> <p>4.1 Candidates collaboratively develop, select, administer, analyze, and interpret multiple measures of student learning, behavior, and the classroom environment to evaluate and support classroom and school-based systems of intervention for students with and without exceptionalities. EDS 473 EDS 362 EDS 464 Field Placement-EDS 473 BIP Report- EDS 362 Assessment Report &ndash; EDS 464</p> <p>4.2 Candidates develop, select, administer, and interpret multiple, formal and informal, culturally and linguistically appropriate measures and procedures that are valid and reliable to contribute to eligibility determination for special education services. EDS 464 Child Assessment Report</p> <p>4.3 Candidates assess, collaboratively analyze, interpret, and communicate students&rsquo; progress toward measurable outcomes using technology as appropriate, to inform both short- and long-term planning, and make ongoing adjustments to instruction. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 362 RTI Project &ndash; EDS 472 Field Placement and lesson plans- EDS 473 BIP Report &ndash; EDS 362</p> <p>5 Supporting Learning Using Effective Instruction: Candidates use knowledge of individuals&rsquo; development, learning needs, and assessment data to inform decisions about effective instruction. Candidates use explicit instructional strategies and employ strategies to promote active engagement and increased motivation to individualize instruction to support each individual. Candidates use whole group instruction, flexible grouping, small group instruction, and individual instruction. Candidates teach individuals to use meta/cognitive strategies to support and self-regulate learning.</p> <p>5.1 Candidates use findings from multiple assessments, including student self-assessment, that are responsive to cultural and linguistic diversity and specialized as needed, to identify what students know and are able to do. They then interpret the assessment data to appropriately plan and guide instruction to meet rigorous academic and non-academic content and goals for each individual. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 362 RTI Project &ndash; EDS 472 Lesson Plans and Observations-EDS 473 BIP Report &ndash; EDS 362</p> <p>5.2 Candidates use effective strategies to promote active student engagement, increase student motivation, increase opportunities to respond, and enhance self‐regulation of student learning. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 362 Self-Correcting Activity Instructional Strategy Presentation RTI Project &ndash; EDS 472 Lesson Plans Observations &ndash; EDS 473 BIP Report - 362</p> <p>5.3 Candidates use explicit, systematic instruction to teach content, strategies, and skills to make clear EDS 364 Dyslexia Assignment &ndash; EDS 364</p> <p>Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators</p> <p>Standard Description UG Courses Assessment what a learner needs to do or think about while learning. EDS 473 EDS 572 Lesson Plans and Observations- 473 Secondary Lesson Plan-572</p> <p>5.4 Candidates use flexible grouping to support the use of instruction that is adapted to meet the needs of each individual and group. EDS 473 Lesson Plans and Observations- EDS 473</p> <p>5.5 Candidates organize and manage focused, intensive small group instruction to meet the learning needs of each individual. EDS 473 RTI Project &ndash; EDS 472 Deposition, Lesson plans and Observations- EDS 473</p> <p>5.6 Candidates plan and deliver specialized, individualized instruction that is used to meet the learning needs of each individual. EDS 472 EDS 473 RTI Project &ndash; EDS 472 Disposition, Lesson plans and Observations- EDS 473</p> <p>6 Supporting Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Growth: Candidates create and contribute to safe, respectful, and productive learning environments for individuals with exceptionalities through the use of effective routines and procedures and use a range of preventive and responsive practices to support social, emotional and educational well-being. They follow ethical and legal guidelines and work collaboratively with families and other professionals to conduct behavioral assessments for intervention and program development.</p> <p>6.1 Candidates use effective routines and procedures to create safe, caring, respectful, and productive learning environments for individuals with exceptionalities. EDS 473 EDS 365 Deposition- EDS 473, Lesson Plans, Observations- EDS 473 Classroom Management Plan Lesson &ndash; EDS 365</p> <p>6.2 Candidates use a range of preventive and responsive practices documented as effective to support individuals&rsquo; social, emotional, and educational well-being. EDS 473 EDS 365 Disposition-EDS 473, Lesson Plans and Observations-EDS 473 Classroom Management Plan &ndash; EDS 365</p> <p>6.3 Candidates systematically use data from a variety of sources to identify the purpose or function served by problem behavior to plan, implement, and evaluate behavioral interventions and social skills programs, including generalization to other environments. EDS 473 EDS 362 Lesson Plans and Observations- EDS 473 BIP Project/Report &ndash; EDS 362</p> <p>7 Collaborating with Team Members: Candidates apply team processes and communication strategies to collaborate in a culturally responsive manner with families, paraprofessionals, and other professionals within the school, other educational settings, and the community to plan programs and access services for individuals with exceptionalities and their families.</p> <p>7.1 Candidates utilize communication, group facilitation, and problem&ndash;solving strategies in a culturally responsive manner to lead effective meetings and share expertise and knowledge to build team capacity EDS 322/323/324 EDS 472 IEP Handbook &ndash; EDS 322/323/324 IEP Role Play &ndash; EDS 472 PBL Community Resources Home Visit Report &ndash; EDS 570</p> <p>Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators</p> <p>Standard Description UG Courses Assessment and jointly address students&rsquo; instructional and behavioral needs. EDS 570</p> <p>7.2 Candidates collaborate, communicate, and coordinate with families, paraprofessionals, and other professionals within the educational setting to assess, plan, and implement effective programs and services that promote progress toward measurable outcomes for individuals with and without exceptionalities and their families. EDS 473 EDS 572 Disposition- EDS 473 Transition Plan - 572</p> <p>7.3 Candidates collaborate, communicate, and coordinate with professionals and agencies within the community to identify and access services, resources, and supports to meet the identified needs of individuals with exceptionalities and their families. EDS 570 EDS 572 Problem Based Learning Project Family Support Project- EDS 570 Transition Plan - 572</p> <p>7.4 Candidates work with and mentor paraprofessionals in the paraprofessionals&rsquo; role of supporting the education of individuals with exceptionalities and their families. EDS 473 Disposition Para reflection Lesson Plan/Observation EDS 473</p>
    List all student learning outcomes for the program.
  • 2. Describe how the student learning outcomes for the program will be assessed?*

    When designing the curriculum and courses for the special education major, the Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators, created by the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) are used. Student learning outcomes for the program are the CEC standards: https://exceptionalchildren.org/standards/initial-

    In the following chart, the CEC standards/student learning outcomes are paired with the courses and assignments used to assess the outcomes.

    Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators

    Standard Description UG Courses Assessment

    Field

    and

    Clinical

    Exp. Special education candidates progress through a series of developmentally sequenced field and clinical experiences for the full range of ages, types and levels of abilities, and collaborative opportunities that are appropriate to the license or roles for which they are preparing. These field and clinical experiences are supervised by qualified professionals. EDS 473 US Observation and Disposition -EDS 473 Observation and Disposition-EDS 473

    1 Engaging in Professional Learning and Practice within Ethical Guidelines: Candidates practice within ethical and legal guidelines; advocate for improved outcomes for individuals with exceptionalities and their families while considering their social, cultural, and linguistic diversity; and engage in ongoing self-reflection to design and implement professional learning activities.

    1.1

    Candidates practice within ethical guidelines and legal policies and procedures. EDS 473 Field Experience Disposition- EDS 473

    Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators

    Standard Description UG Courses Assessment

    1.2 Candidates advocate for improved outcomes for individuals with exceptionalities and their families while addressing the unique needs of those with diverse social, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds. EDS 365 EDS 570 EDS 572 Service Learning Reflection-EDS 365 Home Visit Project/ Family Support Project-EDS 570 Transition Plan – EDS 572

    1.3 Candidates design and implement professional learning activities based on ongoing analysis of student learning; self-reflection; and professional standards, research, and contemporary practices. EDS 473 Lesson Plans-EDS EDS 473

    2 Understanding and Addressing Each Individual’s Developmental and Learning Needs: Candidates use their understanding of human growth and development, the multiple influences on development, individual differences, diversity, including exceptionalities, and families and communities to plan and implement inclusive learning environments and experiences that provide individuals with exceptionalities high quality learning experiences reflective of each individual’s strengths and needs.

    2.1 Candidates apply understanding of human growth and development to create developmentally appropriate and meaningful learning experiences that address individualized strengths and needs of students with exceptionalities. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 365 RTI Project – EDS 472 Lesson Plans- EDS 473 Mayerson Student Philanthropy – EDS 365

    2.2 Candidates use their knowledge and understanding of diverse factors that influence development and learning, including differences related to families, languages, cultures, and communities, and individual differences, including exceptionalities, to plan and implement learning experiences and environments. EDS 472 EDS 570 EDS 473 RTI Project – EDS 472 Home Visit Interview Home Visit Report Family Support Project-570 Lesson Plans and Field Placement-473

    3 Demonstrating Subject Matter Content and Specialized Curricular Knowledge: Candidates apply their understanding of the academic subject matter content of the general curriculum and specialized curricula to inform their programmatic and instructional decisions for learners with exceptionalities.

    3.1 Candidates apply their understanding of academic subject matter content of the general curriculum to inform their programmatic and instructional decisions for individuals with exceptionalities. EDS 472 EDS 473 RTI Project – EDS 472 Lesson Plans and Observations-EDS 473

    3.2 Candidates augment the general education curriculum to address skills and strategies that students with disabilities need to access the core curriculum and function successfully within a variety of contexts as well as the continuum of placement options to assure specially designed instruction is developed and implemented to achieve mastery of curricular standards and individualized goals and objectives. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 572 RTI Project – EDS 472 Lesson Plans and Observations-EDS 473 Secondary Lesson Plan – 572

    Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators

    Standard Description UG Courses Assessment

    4 Using Assessment to Understand the Learner and the Learning Environment for Data-based Decision Making: Candidates assess student’s learning, behavior, and the classroom environment in order to evaluate and support classroom and school-based problem-solving systems of intervention and instruction. Candidates evaluate students to determine their strengths and needs, contribute to students’ eligibility determination, communicate students’ progress, inform short and long-term instructional planning, and make ongoing adjustments to instruction using technology as appropriate.

    4.1 Candidates collaboratively develop, select, administer, analyze, and interpret multiple measures of student learning, behavior, and the classroom environment to evaluate and support classroom and school-based systems of intervention for students with and without exceptionalities. EDS 473 EDS 362 EDS 464 Field Placement-EDS 473 BIP Report- EDS 362 Assessment Report – EDS 464

    4.2 Candidates develop, select, administer, and interpret multiple, formal and informal, culturally and linguistically appropriate measures and procedures that are valid and reliable to contribute to eligibility determination for special education services. EDS 464 Child Assessment Report

    4.3 Candidates assess, collaboratively analyze, interpret, and communicate students’ progress toward measurable outcomes using technology as appropriate, to inform both short- and long-term planning, and make ongoing adjustments to instruction. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 362 RTI Project – EDS 472 Field Placement and lesson plans- EDS 473 BIP Report – EDS 362

    5 Supporting Learning Using Effective Instruction: Candidates use knowledge of individuals’ development, learning needs, and assessment data to inform decisions about effective instruction. Candidates use explicit instructional strategies and employ strategies to promote active engagement and increased motivation to individualize instruction to support each individual. Candidates use whole group instruction, flexible grouping, small group instruction, and individual instruction. Candidates teach individuals to use meta/cognitive strategies to support and self-regulate learning.

    5.1 Candidates use findings from multiple assessments, including student self-assessment, that are responsive to cultural and linguistic diversity and specialized as needed, to identify what students know and are able to do. They then interpret the assessment data to appropriately plan and guide instruction to meet rigorous academic and non-academic content and goals for each individual. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 362 RTI Project – EDS 472 Lesson Plans and Observations-EDS 473 BIP Report – EDS 362

    5.2 Candidates use effective strategies to promote active student engagement, increase student motivation, increase opportunities to respond, and enhance self‐regulation of student learning. EDS 472 EDS 473 EDS 362 Self-Correcting Activity Instructional Strategy Presentation RTI Project – EDS 472 Lesson Plans Observations – EDS 473 BIP Report - 362

    5.3 Candidates use explicit, systematic instruction to teach content, strategies, and skills to make clear EDS 364 Dyslexia Assignment – EDS 364

    Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators

    Standard Description UG Courses Assessment what a learner needs to do or think about while learning. EDS 473 EDS 572 Lesson Plans and Observations- 473 Secondary Lesson Plan-572

    5.4 Candidates use flexible grouping to support the use of instruction that is adapted to meet the needs of each individual and group. EDS 473 Lesson Plans and Observations- EDS 473

    5.5 Candidates organize and manage focused, intensive small group instruction to meet the learning needs of each individual. EDS 473 RTI Project – EDS 472 Deposition, Lesson plans and Observations- EDS 473

    5.6 Candidates plan and deliver specialized, individualized instruction that is used to meet the learning needs of each individual. EDS 472 EDS 473 RTI Project – EDS 472 Disposition, Lesson plans and Observations- EDS 473

    6 Supporting Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Growth: Candidates create and contribute to safe, respectful, and productive learning environments for individuals with exceptionalities through the use of effective routines and procedures and use a range of preventive and responsive practices to support social, emotional and educational well-being. They follow ethical and legal guidelines and work collaboratively with families and other professionals to conduct behavioral assessments for intervention and program development.

    6.1 Candidates use effective routines and procedures to create safe, caring, respectful, and productive learning environments for individuals with exceptionalities. EDS 473 EDS 365 Deposition- EDS 473, Lesson Plans, Observations- EDS 473 Classroom Management Plan Lesson – EDS 365

    6.2 Candidates use a range of preventive and responsive practices documented as effective to support individuals’ social, emotional, and educational well-being. EDS 473 EDS 365 Disposition-EDS 473, Lesson Plans and Observations-EDS 473 Classroom Management Plan – EDS 365

    6.3 Candidates systematically use data from a variety of sources to identify the purpose or function served by problem behavior to plan, implement, and evaluate behavioral interventions and social skills programs, including generalization to other environments. EDS 473 EDS 362 Lesson Plans and Observations- EDS 473 BIP Project/Report – EDS 362

    7 Collaborating with Team Members: Candidates apply team processes and communication strategies to collaborate in a culturally responsive manner with families, paraprofessionals, and other professionals within the school, other educational settings, and the community to plan programs and access services for individuals with exceptionalities and their families.

    7.1 Candidates utilize communication, group facilitation, and problem–solving strategies in a culturally responsive manner to lead effective meetings and share expertise and knowledge to build team capacity EDS 322/323/324 EDS 472 IEP Handbook – EDS 322/323/324 IEP Role Play – EDS 472 PBL Community Resources Home Visit Report – EDS 570

    Specific Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Aligned with the CEC Initial Practice-Based Professional Preparation Standards for Special Educators

    Standard Description UG Courses Assessment and jointly address students’ instructional and behavioral needs. EDS 570

    7.2 Candidates collaborate, communicate, and coordinate with families, paraprofessionals, and other professionals within the educational setting to assess, plan, and implement effective programs and services that promote progress toward measurable outcomes for individuals with and without exceptionalities and their families. EDS 473 EDS 572 Disposition- EDS 473 Transition Plan - 572

    7.3 Candidates collaborate, communicate, and coordinate with professionals and agencies within the community to identify and access services, resources, and supports to meet the identified needs of individuals with exceptionalities and their families. EDS 570 EDS 572 Problem Based Learning Project Family Support Project- EDS 570 Transition Plan - 572

    7.4 Candidates work with and mentor paraprofessionals in the paraprofessionals’ role of supporting the education of individuals with exceptionalities and their families. EDS 473 Disposition Para reflection Lesson Plan/Observation EDS 473

  • If you wish to upload supporting documents for student learning outcomes, please upload them by going to the tab to the right with the paperclip and word Files.

  • 3. Highlight any distinctive qualities of this proposed program.

    CEC Recognition: The Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) is considered the premier professional organization for the field of special education. Teacher preparation programs for special education can seek national recognition from CEC as a component of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) Accreditation Process.  Our current double major has received that recognition for many years.  In fact, according to the list of recognized programs per accredited institutions in the United States posted on the Council for Exceptional Children website, the current special education double major program at NKU is the only special education program that has received national recognition in Kentucky by CEC. The single major will be modeled after the special education component of the current double major, and NKU will be seeking CEC recognition for the single major as well.

    https://exceptionalchildren.org/standards/cec-program-review-and-national-recognition

  • 4. Describe admissions and graduation requirements for the program.*

    Admissions: Undergraduate teacher candidates can apply to the College of Education once they have successfully completed 45 semester hours of required general studies coursework, including having successfully completed EDU 104 and PSY 100 (or an equivalent). Teacher candidates must complete the admission application, submit an FBI background check and create an account with the Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board (EPSB).

    Applicants to the College of Education must meet the minimum GPA and entrace exam requirements. Three options are available:

    Option 1

    · Minimum GPA 2.75 overall (NKU & transfer combined)

    · Minimum Exam Scores

    o ACT Composite of 22; or

    o Combination of subject exams

    § Reading: ACT 20 or Praxis 150

    § English/Writing: ACT 18 or Praxis 158

    § Mathematics: ACT 19 or Praxis 144

    Option 2

    · Minimum GPA 3.00 overall (NKU & transfer combined)

    · Minimum Exam Scores

    o Combination of subject exames w/ lower Praxis

    § Reading: ACT 20 or Praxis 145

    § English/Writing: ACT 18 or Praxis 153

    § Mathematics: ACT 19 or Praxis 139

    Option 3

    · Minimum GPA 3.00 in most recent 30 attempted credit hours

    · Minimum Exam Scores

    o ACT Composite 22; or

    o Combination of subject exams:

    § Reading: ACT 20 or Praxis 150

    § English/Writing: ACT 18 or Praxis 158

    § Mathematics: ACT 19 or Praxis 144

    For full admission, teacher candidates must register for remaining Foundations courses not yet completed (EDU 300, EDU 305, EDU 316 or equivalent). Each of these courses must be completed with a grade of ‘C’ or higher. They must also register for CMST 101 and/or ENG 316 or equivalent. These courses must be completed with a grade of ‘B’ or higher.

    All application requirements must be completed by the deadlines posted, December 1st for Spring admission semester, and August 1st for Fall admission semester.

    Graduation: To successfully complete the Teacher Education degree program, the following requirements must be fulfilled:

    · Successfullly complete at least 120 semester hourse, the last 30 of which must be earned at NKU.

    · Successfully complete at least 45 semester hours of upper-division courses (those numbered at the 300 level or higher).

    · Complete all requirements of the Foundation of Knowledge (general education) curriculum for the applicable catalog year. A checklist is provided to candidates.

    · Complete all major curriculum requirements.

    · Earn all of the following grade point averages

    o 2.75 or higher for all college coursework combined

    § Or, if admitted under the 30-hour rule, 2.75 or higher for all college coursework combined starting from the last 30 credit hours attempted before admission to the Teacher Education Program

    o 2.75 or higher for all coursework attempted at NKU

    § Or, if admitted under the 30-hour rule, 2.75 or higher for all coursework attempted at NKU starting from the last 30 credit hours attempted before admission to the Teacher Education Program.

    o 2.75 or higher in all Professional Education Courses

    o 2.75 or higher in all teacher field courses (where applicable)

    · Successfully complete the Clinical Experience, the Teacher Work Sample, and the final portfolio check.

  • Please provide the total number of hours required for the degree:

  • Total number of hours required for degree
    122
    122
  • Number of hours in degree program core
    92
    92
  • Number of hours in track (undergraduate) or concentration (graduate).
  • Number of hours in guided electives
    30
    30
  • Number of hours in free electives
  • 6.  CPE requires we upload the curriculum in their Excel template.  Click here to download the course template.  All Course Descriptions must be included in the template.  Once you have completed this template attach the document using the tab to the right with the paperclip / Files option.

    You will also need to enter the courses into the Prospective Curriculum field below.

  • Attached*
  • Follow the directions below to add/create proposed curriculum from the CPE template you have uploaded.

    Prospective Curriculum Field

    Step 1

    There are two options to add courses for proposed changes: "Add Course" and "Import Course." For courses that already are in the catalog, click on "Import Course" and find the courses needed. For new classes that are currently going through the Curriculog Approval Process click on "Add Course"-- a box will open asking you for the Prefix, Course Number and Course Title.

    Step 2

    Click on "View Curriculum Schema." Click on "Add Core" which will be the header for your course groups of the program. After creating the different sections you can proceed to assign courses in each header by clicking on "Add Courses" this will bring up the list of courses available from Step 1. Select the courses you wish to add and reorder as needed by dragging courses. For removing courses click on the trash can.

    Commonly used headers: Degree Requirements, Core Courses, Electives.

    If you have never created a curriculum schema, contact the UCC chair for assistance.

  • Prospective Curriculum*
  • 7. Describe administrative oversight to ensure the quality of the program.*

    On an annual basis, each undergraduate program in the College of Education must review program data to identify strengths and areas of concern and generate plans for program improvement if needed.  These are called Quality Assurance Reports.  In order to complete the Quality Assurance Report, each program reviews data on the PRAXIS test, completer surveys, coorperating teacher surveys, teacher work samples, university supervisor lesson plan and disposition evaluations, and cooperating teacher evaluations.  We have also recently started implementing an evaluation to determine teacher effectiveness post graduation.  Additionally, input provided by alumni and professionals in the field who participate in the college advisory committees is considered and addressed.  Together, program facilitators review the assessment outcomes and determine any needed steps for individual and overall program improvement or development.

    The special education program engages in an additional level of review related to the Council for Exceptional Standards (CEC).  In order to maintain National Recognition from CEC, we have identified key assessments we use to determine program effectiveness  (Please see the CEC Standards chart for specific assignments used during this evaluation).  We save student outcome data for each of the courses listed, and report that outcome data to CEC during the scheduled review cycle, but we also use this same data for our annual Quality Assurance Report, accreditation, and program evaluation.

  • 8. For a program offered in compressed time frames (less than full semester), describe the methodology for determing that levels of knowledge and competencies comparable to those required in traditional formats have been achieved. (If program is not offered in a compressed time frame, enter "Program will not be offered in a compressed time frame" in the field below. *

    Program will not be offered in a compressed time frame.

  • Additional Information needed to activate the program in CPE Inventory.

  • Instructional Delivery Methods to be used
  • Will this program utilize alternative learning formats (e.g. distance learning, technology-enhanced instruction, evening/weekend classes, accelerated courses)? *
  • Have you created the 4 Year Plan for this program? (If Yes, Please upload a copy using the Files tab on the right hand side of the proposal.)*
DEMAND
  • Program Demand/Unnecessary Duplication

    The institution must demonstrate demand for the proposed program. All proposed programs must address student demand. Programs must also address either employer demand or academic disciplinary needs.

  • Justification: This is an open-ended response that will be used in CPE agenda items. Within your response you should also establish the demand for this program and note if it replaces another program on campus. Remember that the audience will be CPE, not higher education administrators, faculty or staff. *

    The field of education is experiencing an exodus due to a variety of social and political factors (NCES, 2022).  This reality is magnified in the field of special education where the void of qualified teachers expands, and we face critical shortages. The U.S. Department of Education (2021) reported that 49 states and the District of Columbia currently have teacher shortages in this field and the U.S. Labor Bureau of Statistics called the shortage of special education teachers acute. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, 45% of schools across the country reported they had at least one unfilled vacancy in special education last winter. The National Association of State Directors of Special Education described the national shortage in special educators as having reached epic proportions (K-12 Dive, 2023). The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics predicted an annual need for 37,600 special educators between 2021 and 2031 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2023).  This shortage is happening at a time when we are experiencing increases in the percentage of students receiving special education services nationally (Monnin, Day, Strimel, & Kasey, 2023; NEA, 2019). 

     

    Data in Kentucky

    Kentucky has not been immune to the special education teacher shortage, reportedly being one of the top three states (along with New York and California), in desperate need of special educators (Zippia, 2021).  Since 2019, the Kentucky Department of Education has listed Special Education Services as an area of extreme teacher shortages (KDE, 2023).  The northern Kentucky region is experiencing shortages equivalent to the rest of the state, as noted by a recent College of Education survey conducted of local school Superintendents which revealed special education as an area of high priority for teachers.

     

    Due to this void in special educators/intervention specialists, school districts have been forced to hire personnel who have not received formal training in teaching students with disabilities. Graduate alternative certification programs (Option 6) like the one at NKU have seen increases as a result but these programs, although helpful in filling the void, place people without teaching qualifications in positions of responsibility for students with disabilities, long before they are credentialed to teach. NKU’s undergraduate teacher preparation is feeling the pressure for graduating more qualified teachers as we’ve recently begun allowing students in their final clinical field experience to be hired as long-term substitute teachers in order to fill previously empty positions.  Even when formal education programs are accessed to fill positions, the reality is that P-12 students with the greatest needs are being taught by those who are least qualified.

     

    The special education major is currently paired as a double major with one of the other teacher preparation programs including elementary, middle grades, or secondary.  The proposed change is to offer a single major in special education, while also still keeping the double major option for those who would like to complete the double major.  It really isn’t a new program, but rather a new way to package the current program to offer students a more efficient and economical way to earn a degree in special education. Currently teacher candidates must complete a double major in order to be certified in special education.  This requirement imposes financial burdens, as well as requiring extended credit hours well beyond the 120 typically required for a Bachelor’s degree.

     

    By having a single major in special education, the College of Education would also be able to respond to requests for an Option 9 program in special education. Option 9 provides opportunities for those currently serving as para-professionals in schools to earn their Bachelor’s degree while working in a school district (EPSB, 2023). If we were to add an Option 9 route to a Bachelor degree in special education, we would be able to positively impact the region by producing more qualified teacher candidates for hire in school districts. NKU would be the first Option 9 program for special education in the state of Kentucky.

     

    Specifically, Fayette County Public Schools has requested an Option 9 Cohort for their paraprofessionals.  A recent survey of their para-professionals has identified over 50 people interested in this option for special education certification and degrees. There is also potential for a second cohort comprised of para-professionals across a combination of local public schools in northern Kentucky.  Implementing these cohorts would increase the enrollment of NKU’s special education program exponentially and would highlight NKU as a leader in special education certification.

     

    References

    EPSB. (2023). Option 9: Expedited Route. Division of Educator Licensure and Quality, Education Professional Standards Board. Retrieved from http://www.epsb.ky.gov/mod/page/view.php?id=506

     

    K-12 Dive. 2023. K-12 Dive, Retrieved from https://www.k12dive.com/news/States-tackle-special-educator-shortage/640925/#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20National%20Center,educators%20between%202021%20and%202031.

     

    KDE. (2023). Critical shortage areas, Kentucky Department of Education. Retrieved from https://education.ky.gov/pages/search.aspx?terms=special+education+teacher+shortages&affiliateId=EDUCATION

     

    Monnin, K., Day, J., Strimel, M., & Kasey, D. (2023). The special education teacher shortage: A policy analysis. Council for Exceptional Children. Retrieved from https://education.ky.gov/pages/search.aspx?terms=special+education+teacher+shortages&affiliateId=EDUCATION

     

    NCES. (2022). U.S. schools report increased teacher vacancies due to COVID-19 pandemic, new NCES data show. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/whatsnew/press_releases/3_3_2022.asp

     

    U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Teacher Shortage Areashttps://tsa.ed.gov/#/reports

     

    U.S. Labor Bureau of Statistics (2023. Projections for teachers: How many are leaving the occupation? Career Outlook, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2018/data-on-display/how-many-teachers-are-leaving.htm

     

    Zippia: The Career Expert. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.zippia.com/answers/where-is-the-highest-demand-for-special-education-teachers/

     

    Indicate source of market demand information and timeframe for growth projections.*

  • STUDENT DEMAND
  • 1a. Provide evidence of student demand. Evidence of student demand is typically in the form of surveys of potential students or enrollments in related programs at the institution, but other methods of gauging student demand are acceptable. Note if it replaces another program in campus.*

    The field of education is experiencing an exodus due to a variety of social and political factors (NCES, 2022).  This reality is magnified in the field of special education where the void of qualified teachers expands, and we face critical shortages. The U.S. Department of Education (2021) reported that 49 states and the District of Columbia currently have teacher shortages in this field and the U.S. Labor Bureau of Statistics called the shortage of special education teachers acute. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, 45% of schools across the country reported they had at least one unfilled vacancy in special education last winter. The National Association of State Directors of Special Education described the national shortage in special educators as having reached epic proportions (K-12 Dive, 2023). The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics predicted an annual need for 37,600 special educators between 2021 and 2031 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2023).  This shortage is happening at a time when we are experiencing increases in the percentage of students receiving special education services nationally (Monnin, Day, Strimel, & Kasey, 2023; NEA, 2019). 

     

    Data in Kentucky

    Kentucky has not been immune to the special education teacher shortage, reportedly being one of the top three states (along with New York and California), in desperate need of special educators (Zippia, 2021).  Since 2019, the Kentucky Department of Education has listed Special Education Services as an area of extreme teacher shortages (KDE, 2023).  The northern Kentucky region is experiencing shortages equivalent to the rest of the state, as noted by a recent College of Education survey conducted of local school Superintendents which revealed special education as an area of high priority for teachers.

     

    Due to this void in special educators/intervention specialists, school districts have been forced to hire personnel who have not received formal training in teaching students with disabilities. Graduate alternative certification programs (Option 6) like the one at NKU have seen increases as a result but these programs, although helpful in filling the void, place people without teaching qualifications in positions of responsibility for students with disabilities, long before they are credentialed to teach. NKU’s undergraduate teacher preparation is feeling the pressure for graduating more qualified teachers as we’ve recently begun allowing students in their final clinical field experience to be hired as long-term substitute teachers in order to fill previously empty positions.  Even when formal education programs are accessed to fill positions, the reality is that P-12 students with the greatest needs are being taught by those who are least qualified.

     

    The special education major is currently paired as a double major with one of the other teacher preparation programs including elementary, middle grades, or secondary.  The proposed change is to offer a single major in special education, while also still keeping the double major option for those who would like to complete the double major.  It really isn’t a new program, but rather a new way to package the current program to offer students a more efficient and economical way to earn a degree in special education. Currently teacher candidates must complete a double major in order to be certified in special education.  This requirement imposes financial burdens, as well as requiring extended credit hours well beyond the 120 typically required for a Bachelor’s degree.

     

    By having a single major in special education, the College of Education would also be able to respond to requests for an Option 9 program in special education. Option 9 provides opportunities for those currently serving as para-professionals in schools to earn their Bachelor’s degree while working in a school district (EPSB, 2023). If we were to add an Option 9 route to a Bachelor degree in special education, we would be able to positively impact the region by producing more qualified teacher candidates for hire in school districts. NKU would be the first Option 9 program for special education in the state of Kentucky.

     

    Specifically, Fayette County Public Schools has requested an Option 9 Cohort for their paraprofessionals.  A recent survey of their para-professionals has identified over 50 people interested in this option for special education certification and degrees. There is also potential for a second cohort comprised of para-professionals across a combination of local public schools in northern Kentucky.  Implementing these cohorts would increase the enrollment of NKU’s special education program exponentially and would highlight NKU as a leader in special education certification.

     

    References

    EPSB. (2023). Option 9: Expedited Route. Division of Educator Licensure and Quality, Education Professional Standards Board. Retrieved from http://www.epsb.ky.gov/mod/page/view.php?id=506

     

    K-12 Dive. 2023. K-12 Dive, Retrieved from https://www.k12dive.com/news/States-tackle-special-educator-shortage/640925/#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20National%20Center,educators%20between%202021%20and%202031.

     

    KDE. (2023). Critical shortage areas, Kentucky Department of Education. Retrieved from https://education.ky.gov/pages/search.aspx?terms=special+education+teacher+shortages&affiliateId=EDUCATION

     

    Monnin, K., Day, J., Strimel, M., & Kasey, D. (2023). The special education teacher shortage: A policy analysis. Council for Exceptional Children. Retrieved from https://education.ky.gov/pages/search.aspx?terms=special+education+teacher+shortages&affiliateId=EDUCATION

     

    NCES. (2022). U.S. schools report increased teacher vacancies due to COVID-19 pandemic, new NCES data show. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/whatsnew/press_releases/3_3_2022.asp

     

    U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Teacher Shortage Areashttps://tsa.ed.gov/#/reports

     

    U.S. Labor Bureau of Statistics (2023. Projections for teachers: How many are leaving the occupation? Career Outlook, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2018/data-on-display/how-many-teachers-are-leaving.htm

     

    Zippia: The Career Expert. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.zippia.com/answers/where-is-the-highest-demand-for-special-education-teachers/

     

    Indicate source of market demand information and timeframe for growth projections.*

    Typically in the form of surveys of potential students and/or enrollments in related programs at the institution.
  • Project extimated student enrolment and degrees conferred over first five years of the program - (First 5 Years)
  • Degrees Conferred-Academic Yr.

    Proj. Enrollment-Fall Semester

  • Degrees Conferred - 1st Year
    Projected Enrollment - Year 1
    15
    15
  • Degrees Conferred - Year 2
    Projected Enrollment - Year 2
    20
    20
  • Degrees Conferred - Year 3
    Projected Enrollment - Year 3
    25
    25
  • Degrees Conferred - Year 4
    Projected Enrollment - Year 4
    30
    30
  • Degrees Conferred - Year 5
    Projected Enrollment - Year 5
    20
    20
  • Program Demand / Unnecessary Duplication / Collaboration within and among other Institutions.  You should contact the Office of the Provost (Jason Vest - vestj3@nku.edu) for the Gray Associates Program Evaluation System Scorecard data snapshot for new program document and upload a copy under the Files tab on the right side of this proposal.

  • EMPLOYER DEMAND
  • If the program is designed for students to enter the workforce immediately, please complete the following table.


    Most of the current Bureau of Labor Statistics projections are for 2016-2026.  If additional sources are used, please note the time frame for the projections in the title field. 

    Other sources include:

    Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce
    Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Occupational Outlook Handbook
    Kentucky Center for Statistics

    KY Chamber, “Kentucky’s Workforce, Progress and Challenges,” January 2018

    Kentucky, Bridging the Talent Gap

    Document - https://www.bridgingthetalentgap.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/KY-Statewide.pdf 
    Interactive website: https://bridgingthetalentgap.org/dashboards/

  • Sources Used
  • Type / Title of Job #1
    Special Education Teacher / Intervention Specialist
    Special Education Teacher / Intervention Specialist
  • Regional Average Wage
    Regional # of Job Openings
    88
    88
  • Regional Growth Projections:
    7%
    7%
  • State Average Wage
    State # of Job Openings
    1,420 in 2020
    1,420 in 2020
  • State Growth PRojections:
    8%
    8%
  • National Average Wage
    $61,820 nationally
    $61,820 nationally
    National # of Job Openings
    476,300 (2021)
    476,300 (2021)
  • National Growth Projections:
    Regional needs reflect state and national trends. This institution’s region includes not just northern Kentucky, but a tri-state region which includes southwest Ohio and the Cincinnati area, as well as southeast Indiana. In the Cincinnati Public School District alone, 32 intervention specialist positions were posted (May 11, 2023). According to individual district websites, public school districts in northern Kentucky are also demonstrating a need for intervention specialists/special education teachers (May 11, 2023): • Boone County Public Schools: 12 available positions • Campbell County Public Schools: 10 available positions • Kenton County Public Schools: 14 available positions • Fayette County Schools: 20 available positions Note: These numbers do not include open intervention specialist positions posted in the numerous independent school districts surrounding Northern Kentucky University, nor the other public school districts in southwest Ohio or southeast Indiana.
    Regional needs reflect state and national trends. This institution’s region includes not just northern Kentucky, but a tri-state region which includes southwest Ohio and the Cincinnati area, as well as southeast Indiana. In the Cincinnati Public School District alone, 32 intervention specialist positions were posted (May 11, 2023). According to individual district websites, public school districts in northern Kentucky are also demonstrating a need for intervention specialists/special education teachers (May 11, 2023): • Boone County Public Schools: 12 available positions • Campbell County Public Schools: 10 available positions • Kenton County Public Schools: 14 available positions • Fayette County Schools: 20 available positions Note: These numbers do not include open intervention specialist positions posted in the numerous independent school districts surrounding Northern Kentucky University, nor the other public school districts in southwest Ohio or southeast Indiana.

  • Type / Title of Job #2
  • Regional Average Wage
    Regional # of Job Openings
  • Regional Growth Projections
  • State Average Wage
    State # of Job Openings
  • State Growth Projection
  • National Average Wage
    National # of Job Openings
  • National Growth Projection

  • Type / Title Job #3
  • Regional Average Wage
    Regional # of Job Openings
  • Regional Growth Projections
  • State Average Wage
    State # of Job Openings
  • State Growth Projections
  • National Average Wage
    National # of Job Openings
  • National Growth Projections
  • Data provided in tables or PDF documents must be uploaded.

    Attach additional documentation using the paperclip /File option on the right hand menu.

  • Clearly describe evidence of employer demand. Such evidence may include employer surveys, current labor market analyses, and future human resources projections. Where appropriate, evidence should demonstrate employers’ preferences for graduates of the proposed program over persons having alternative existing credentials and employers’ willingness to pay higher salaries to graduates of the proposed program. Note if it replaces another program on campus.

  • ACADEMIC DISCIPLINARY NEED
  • If the program proposal is in response to changes in academic disciplinary need, as opposed to employer demand, please outline those changes. Explain why these changes to the discipline necessitate development of a new program. *

    Currently at NKU, in order to be certified as a special education teacher/intervention specialist in Kentucky, teacher candidates must double major in both special education and general education, such as elementary, middle grades, or secondary education.  This requirement adds additional burdens to those who wish to teach students with disabilities in schools versus those who want to major in general education only.  This includes more credit hours which equates to more tuition dollars owed and more time spent in classes.  We already have a quality special education program in place, so all we want to do is offer students an option to divorce from the double major and pursue a single major in special education.  The reduction in course requirements, time and tuition will hopefully result in more undergraduate teacher candidates choosing NKU for their teaching credentials, drawing students from the tri-state region, including southwest Ohio, the Cincinnati metropolitan area, southeast Indiana, and northern Kentucky.

  • SIMILAR PROGRAMS
  • A new program may serve the same potential student population. The proposed program must be sufficiently different from existing programs in the state or access to existing programs must be sufficiently limited to warrant initiation of a new program.  Only programs at other Kentucky institutions need to be included.

    If similar programs exist in Kentucky, you should contact the Other Institutions and provide Feedback from your communications with those Institutions. You can complete the following information or upload this information by using the paperclip / Files tab on the right side of the proposal.

     For questions on enrollment or degree data, please contact kpedshelp@ky.gov.

  • ________________________________________________________________
    Similar Program # 1

  • Institution
    Thomas More University
    Thomas More University
  • Program Name
    Special Education
    Special Education
  • b. Provide the following information: a comparison of objectives/focus/curriculum to similar programs, student populations, access to existing programs, and feedback from other institutions.
          1. The special education program at Thomas More University is similar in objectives/focus/and curriculum, but NKU has a variety of characteristics and program components that make it unique from Thomas More, including school embedded experiential learning beyond formal field experiences, service learning opportunities, and all the supports and services offered by a larger, regional state-supported university.  The program will also seek national recognition from the Council for Exceptional Children.

    The degree program at Thomas More is similar in scope to NKU’s current and proposed special education teacher preparation programs.  NKU has a reciprocity agreement with Thomas More so students could readily transfer credits from one institution to the other.

    At NKU, teacher candidates who complete the LBD degree at either institution can add MSD certification as a post-baccalaureate or graduate candidate with just 16-19 additional credit hours.

          1. : Thomas More University is the only institution in Kentucky that we could find currently offering a single major in special education for learning and behavior disorders.  However, this institution is a small, private, parochial, liberal arts institution so it is not comparable to NKU in enrollment or student demographics.

    NKU strives at recruiting and maintaining a diverse student body.  With a reduction in time and financial commitments, we hope to recruit more potential students form the Cincinnati metropolitan area, including students who currently attend Cincinnati Public Schools.  We also hope to attract students who desire to be an intervention specialist in LBD without general education certification.  This is a very specific student who likely had positive experiences before college, learning alongside, living with, tutoring, orotherwise supporting or befreiending someone with a disability.  We will be able to reach out to those potential candidates in northern Kentucky, southwest Ohio, and souteast Indiana, who have that goal in mind.  We will also be able to develop an Option 9 program for para-professionals once we have a single major in place.

  • c. How will the program support or be supported by other programs within the institution?
  • ________________________________________________________________
    Similar Program # 2

  • Institution
    The special education programs offered at other regional universities in Kentucky have either a double major requirement, a duo certification requirement (LBD/MSD), or a non-degree certification program that can be added on to another education major, so they are not similar to NKU’s proposed program. However, a summary of information about these other special education programs in the state is offered here for comparison.
    The special education programs offered at other regional universities in Kentucky have either a double major requirement, a duo certification requirement (LBD/MSD), or a non-degree certification program that can be added on to another education major, so they are not similar to NKU’s proposed program. However, a summary of information about these other special education programs in the state is offered here for comparison.
  • Program Title
  • b. Provide the following information: a comparison of objectives/focus/curriculum to similar programs, student populations, access to existing programs, and feedback from other institutions.

    The primary difference between the proposed NKU LBD single major from what EKU, WKU, Murray State, Morehead University and UK offer is that the other programs require teacher candidates to be a double major with either elementary, middle or secondary and special education, or duo certification in special education requiring the completion of both LBD and MSD certifications in order to earn the degree in special education.  These institutions do not offer a stand-alone LBD major.

    Nevertheless, we reached out to other public universities with related, but not exact programs. 

    Four Kentucky public institutions were contacted with a request to comment on and provide support for a proposal for developing a single major in special education for LBD certification at Northern Kentucky University.  These institutions included Murray State University, Eastern Kentucky University, Western Kentucky University, and the University of Kentucky. A summary of their feedback is provided below.

     

    All universities who responded provided support for the proposal, further stating that there is a definite need for increasing the number of special education teachers, particularly in the northern part of the state. One institution shared that their institution has been contacted by potential teacher candidates who live in northern Kentucky, seeking a quicker pathway to special education certification than what NKU already has, and made particular mention to the benefits of creating an Option 9 program from the single major. Many ideas were shared about how an effective Option 9 program might work. 

     

    There was support for the coursework centered on reading instruction, particularly given the new state requirements for an emphasis on the science of reading, though one institution wanted to ensure that the topics extend to 6-12 students as well, which they do. Finally, one institution wanted to ensure that we have adequate faculty to teach the courses within this program. Advocating for and seeking additional special education faculty as new students enter this program will be paramount for its success.

  • c. How will the program support or be supported by other programs within the institution?

    In collaboration with the elementary teacher preparation program in the College of Education, special education majors will be provided with extensive instruction in teaching reading, including a field placement practicum experience with a reading specialist or interventionist who specializes in teaching reading.

    The special education program also provides two required courses in special education for all general education majors: 1) EDS 360 Students with Exceptionalities in Schools; and 2) EDS 322/323/324 (depending on major) Instructional Planning for Inclusive (elementary, middle grades, or secondary) Classrooms.  These courses will continue to be offered for education majors.

  • If there are additional, similar programs, please complete the same information for each program/Institution combination and upload it under the Paperclip/Files tab on the right side of the proposal.

COST
  • The resource requirements and planned sources of funding of the proposed program must be detailed in order to assess the adequacy of the resources to support a quality program. This assessment is to ensure that the program will be efficient in its resource utilization and to assess the impact of this proposed program on the institution’s overall need for funds.

    • Complete the Funding Source template and Breakdown of Budget Expenses/Requirements template for the first five years of the proposed program and provide an explanation of how the institution will sustain funding needs, *CPE provided Excel Templates for this step.  The total funding and expenses in the table should be the same, or explain sources(s) of additional funding for the proposed program.  Links to the Funding Source and Budget Expenses/Requirement Templates are:

    A.  Funding Source Template

    B.  Budget Expenses/Requiement Breakdown Template

    Please upload these completed documents using the tab with the paper clip icon labeled Files on the right hand side of this proposal to upload.  NOTE:  All narrative fields must be completed.  If you have no narrative for a specific section, enter N/A. 

  • I have completed and uploaded the Funding Sources Template*
  • I have completed and uploaded the Budget Expenses/Requirements Breakdown Template*
ASSSESS
  • Describe program evaluation procedures for the proposed program. These procedures may include evaluation of courses and faculty by students, administrators, and departmental personnel as appropriate. Program review procedures shall include standards and guidelines for the assessment of student outcomes implied by the program objectives and consistent with the institutional mission.

  • What are the plans to evaluate students' post-graduate success? *

    On an annual basis, each undergraduate program in the College of Education must review program data to identify strengths and areas of concern and generate plans for program improvement if needed.  These are called Quality Assurance Reports.  In order to complete the Quality Assurance Report, each program reviews data on the PRAXIS test, completer surveys, coorperating teacher surveys, teacher work samples, university supervisor lesson plan and disposition evaluations, and cooperating teacher evaluations.  We have also recently started implementing an evaluation to determine teacher effectiveness post graduation.  We also include input provided by alumni and professionals in the field who participate in the college advisory committees.  Together, program facilitators review the assessment outcomes and determine any needed steps for program improvement.

    The special education program engages in an additional level of review related to the Council for Exceptional Standards (CEC).  In order to maintain National Recognition from CEC, we have identified key assessments we use to determine program effectiveness  (Please see the CEC Standards chart for specific assignments used during this evaluation).  We save student outcome data for each of the courses listed, and report that outcome data to CEC during the scheduled review cycle, but we also use this same data for our annual Quality Assurance Report and program evaluation.

    The institution also engages in regularly scheduled reviews by the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP), following CAEP standards for the evaluation process.  The special education program has always been included in this detailed evaluation for accreditation, and it will continue to be included as a single major.  Data from the Quality Assurance Reports are included in the accreditation process, as well as a review of documents and interviews.  Since this data is already being collected, it will be a smooth transition to include the single major in this process.

ADVANCED PRACTICE DOCTORATE
  • If the proposed program is an advanced practice doctorate, please address the following 5 questions.  If not, skip this section and Finalize and Approve the proposal.

    For submission to CPE you will need to attach the following, additional documentation, click on the Files tab in the right hand menu bar. 

    1. Letter of commitment from each clinical site that specifies the number of students to be accommodated and identifies other academic programs that also use the facilities.

    2. Letter from each institution with a similar program stating that the proposed program will not negatively impact the existing program.

  • Describe how the doctorate builds upon the reputation and resources of the existing master’s degree program in the field.
  • Provide a description of the master's program or programs and note any distinctive qualities of these programs as well as any national recognition bestowed upon the program.
  • Explain the new practice or licensure requirements in the profession and/or requirements by specialized accrediting agencies that necessitate a new doctoral program.
  • Provide any evidence, such as a professional organization or an accrediting agency requireing a doctorate in order for graduates to practice or advance in the field of study.
  • Explain the impact of the proposed program on undergraduate education at the institution. Within the explanation, note specifically if new undergraduate courses in the field will be needed, or if any courses will be cut
  • If there is no impact on undergraduate education, please provide a synopsis of how a new doctorate can be developed and implemented without financial or staffing implications for undergraduate education.
  • Provide evidence that funding for the program will not impair funding of any existing program at any other public university.
    • Upload a letter from each institution with a similar program stating that the proposed program will not negatively impact the existing program.

    • Include a summary of financial information from institutions with similar programs.
  • Provide contingency plans in the event that required resources do not materialize.
LAUNCH PROPOSAL
  • Once all the above required fields have been filled in, launch proposal by selecting the Launch option on the top menu of this proposal.  After launching the proposal you can begin entering data in the remaining fields or editing the imported or required fields.

FINALIZE AND APPROVE
  • Once you are happy with the information in the proposal:

    • Upload any additional documentation or files by clicking the Files tab on the right hand menu.

    To finalize your proposal and send it on to the next approval step, you must click the decision tab on the right side of the proposal, in the decision screen, click approve and then click "make my decision."

CIP CODES AND APPROVAL DATES
  • CIP Code
    13.1001
    13.1001
  • BOR Approval Date
  • CPE Final Approval Date
  • CPE ID
  • User Tracking

    Help: Show Original: This option displays the proposal as it appeared at launch. No markup will be visible on the form. There will be no differentiation between fields that contain imported content and content that was created or selected by the originator by hand.

    Help: Show Current: This option displays the proposal as it appears currently. No markup will be visible on the form. There will be no differentiation between fields that contain imported content and content that was created or selected by the originator by hand.

    Help: Show Current with Markup: This option displays the proposal with all of its current content marked to show different editors. Text fields that include imported content are indicated by a blue highlight, and may also include additional changes within, indicated by each editor’s unique color. Fields containing selects, checkboxes, radio buttons, or widgets (such as the curriculum) provide an activity log above the field, indicating each editor’s selection and unique color.

    Comments

    You have not saved your changes to all the assessment fields you edited. You have the following options:

    • Click "Save All Changes" now to save every change you made
    • Click "Abandon Changes" to destroy all unsaved changes
    • Click "Cancel" to continue working on assessments and save each field individually

    What would you like to do?

      You must be logged in, in order to approve.

      Please upload the form that you just printed and signed.

      This will be used as your signature to sign this proposal upon approval.


      Listed below are the symbols and colors utilized in Curriculum:

      • = has not made a decision
      • = approved
      • = rejected
      • = held
      • = suspended
      • = cancelled
      • = multiple decisions
      • = task
      • = mine
      • = stuck
      • = urgent, out of date import source
      x

      #{title}

      #{text}

      x
      warning

      #{title}

      #{text}

      x
      warning

      #{title}

      #{text}