Mechatronics Engineering Technology, B.S.

z-2017-2018 New Academic Program

completed

What can I do next?

View the Proposal

  • View changes to the proposal by clicking the Discussion tab and selecting "Show current with markup" on the User Tracking dropdown.
  • View current comments concerning this proposal by clicking the Discussion tab.
  • View the history of the proposal by clicking the Workflow Status tab.
  • View the signatures the proposal has collected by clicking the Signatures tab.
  • View the files associated with the proposal by clicking the Files tab.
  • Compare the proposal with related proposal by clicking the Proposal Lookup tab.
General Catalog Information
Next

  • Select Program below.

    Shared Cores are available in Acalog for shared information in program curriculum.

  • Type of Program *

  • **Read before you begin**

    1. Please turn on the help text before starting this proposal by clicking on the icon in the top right corner of the heading. Items with help text indicating format should be typed in the exact format as the help text (excluding the quote marks).
    2. Once all required fields have been filled in, click in the upper left corner, to launch proposal.
    3. Once you have launched the proposal form you can then begin editing imported fields, adding justifications, etc. All changes from that point will be tracked. Optionally, you may also attach syllabi or any additional supporting documents by clicking on the Proposal Toolbox icon.  . Please be aware that forms submitted without appropriate justifications will be returned to the proposer without consideration.
  • Identify Purpose of Proposal*
  • Academic Unit*
    (e.g. Department, Division, School)
  • Program Level*
  • Does this proposal require TEC approval?*
  • Degree Level*
  • If Certificate, select appropriate option
  • Program Type*
  • Degree Type*
  • Status*
  • Title of Proposed Degree Program*
    Mechatronics Engineering Technology, B.S.
    Mechatronics Engineering Technology, B.S.
  • EEO Status
  • Name of Program Director*
    Morteza Sadat-Hossieny
    Morteza Sadat-Hossieny
  • Intended Date of Implementation*
    Fall 2017
    Fall 2017
  • Anticipated Date for Granting First Degrees*
    spring 2021
    spring 2021
  • Date of Governing Board Approval
    NA
    NA
  • Date of CPE Approval
    NA
    NA
  • Evaluation Criteria

  • All actions in the approval of new programs for public institutions are subject to a stipulation regarding the program’s ability to attain specified goals that have been established by the institution and approved by the Council on Postsecondary Education (the Council). At the conclusion of an appropriate period of time, the program’s performance shall be reviewed by Council staff following criteria established in the Council’s Academic Programs Policy.

  • Centrality to the Institution’s Mission and Consistency with State’s Goals

  • A program will adhere to the role and scope of the institution as set forth in its mission statement and as complemented by the institution’s strategic plan.

  • List the objectives of the proposed program*

    Student success: The MET program blends a carefully chosen mix of mechanical manufacturing with electronics disciplines to prepare the graduates to be successful in the ever-changing settings of modern industry. Also, the program will provide students with hands-on experience opportunities in industrial controls, and system manufacturing, design, integration and evaluation.

    Economic and Community Development: Northern Kentucky hosts many advanced manufacturing companies that produce high value-added products. Companies such as Mazak, Bosch Automotive, Fives, Mubea, and others play a significant role in the region’s economy and the availability of adequately trained individuals is essential to fulfill their human resources/workforce needs. The employers in the region have repeatedly expressed such needs to the local institutions’ faculty and administrators. Efforts will be made in recruiting non-traditional and underrepresented students in order to address the challenges of fulfilling local industry’s needs and requirements in our area. The MET program will graduate potential industry leaders, managers and supervisors with a broader view of STEM disciplines, which may provide additional incentives for prospective students’ choosing STEM – related areas of study.

    Efficiency and innovation: The collaboration between NKU and CSTCC will increase the number of NKU students, attracting graduates from CSTCC interested in obtaining a B.S. degree. Such an increase will occur without increase of infrastructure costs for the first 5 years or an increase of over 50 students within the EGT programs. MET students will have access to both institutions’ facilities.

    These objectives should deal with the specific institutional and societal needs that this program will address.
  • Explain how the proposed program relates to the institutional mission and academic plan*

    Student success: Implementation will provide training in state-of-the-art techniques and technological tools and will  offer experiential leaning opportunities allowing MET students to address problems with a multidisciplinary approach appropriate for the ever-changing aspects of modern industry.

    Talent development: In graduating potential industry leaders, managers and supervisors with a broader view of STEM disciplines, the MET program will provide additional incentives to prospective students to consider majors in STEM areas, potentially attracting students from minority and non-traditional groups to the new program.

    Academic innovation: The MET program will be a program which is interdisciplinary, aligning our curriculum with the expectations of our stakeholders (students, employers), cooperating with other institutions and encouraging/supporting research in different areas of industry.

    Community engagement: The MET program will intensify partnerships with local industry, businesses as well as local government in order to provide experiential learning opportunities to our students. The MET program will also increase awareness of STEM disciplines in our area.

    Institutional Excellence: The MET program will address the growing needs of automated industry in the greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky region. The program combines mechanical design, manufacturing and electrical controls within a foundational context of manufacturing. Students in this program will benefit from co-op and internship opportunities offered by local industry.

  • Explain how the proposed program addresses the state’s postsecondary education strategic agenda*

    Accountability:  The outcomes of the MET program will be established and assessed through a process consistent with the current ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) criteria for accrediting engineering technology programs within the guidelines of ABET-ETAC (Engineering Technology Accreditation Committee).

    Performance Metrics and Targets: Local industry partners provide most of the students with Co-op and internship experience opportunities, both of which afford an experiential learning component. Feedback from our industry partners will promote the processes of continuous improvement and assessment of course outcomes. Also students learning outcomes will be embedded in the program, addressing the extent to which the programs meet applicable ABET Criteria and policies for accreditation.

  • Explain how the proposed program furthers the statewide implementation plan*

    The University mission entails delivering innovative, student-centered education with engagement in impactful scholarly and creative endeavors, all of which empower our graduates to have fulfilling careers and meaningful lives, while contributing to the economic, civic, and social vitality of the region. In this sense, the MET program will provide students with the knowledge and skills necessary to comply with industry requirements for professionals with interdisciplinary thinking, which in turn makes our region attractive to manufacturers and new technology developers. 

  • Program Quality and Student Success

  • The curriculum should be structured to meet the stated objectives and student learning outcomes of the program.

  • Student learning outcomes of the program
    No Student learning outcomes of the program
    List all student learning outcomes for the program.
  • Explain how the curriculum achieves the program-level student learning outcomes*

    By the time of graduation, students in the MET program will provide:

    • SO1. An ability to select and apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of  Mechatronics engineering technology to the design, manufacturing, testing, evaluation, and maintenance of mechanical and manufacturing systems;
    • SO2. An ability to select and apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to selection of materials, manufacturing processes, tooling, automation, production operations, maintenance, quality, industrial organization, management and statistics to solve mechatronics related problems;
    • SO3. An ability to conduct standard tests and measurements to aid in the characterization, analysis, and troubleshooting of electromechanical systems
    • SO4. An ability to produce drawings and utilize appropriate computer programs using circuit analysis, analog and digital electronics, basic instrumentation and computers to aid in the characterization, analysis and troubleshooting of mechatronics systems
    • SO5. An ability to function effectively as a member or leader on a technical team;
    • SO6. An ability to identify, analyze, and solve engineering technology problems in planning, optimization and automation of facilities and materials handling systems with robotics.  
    • SO7. An ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and nontechnical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature;
    • SO8. An understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development;
    • SO9. An understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity;
    • SO10. A knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and global context; and
    • SO11. A commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement.
    Describe the relationship between the overall curriculum or the major curricular components and the program objectives.
  • Highlight any distinctive qualities of this proposed program*

    The purpose of this program is to develop and implement a multidisciplinary B.S. in Mechatronics Engineering Technology (MET) program synchronous with the needs of industry in the Northern Kentucky / Southern Ohio regions. This is a new 4 year B.S. program with a 2+2 articulation involving NKU and Cincinnati State Technical and Community College (CSTCC).

    The courses in the curriculum will be selected from existing courses in the Engineering Technology B.S. degree programs at Northern Kentucky University (NKU), as well as the associate degree programs at CSTCC for the 2+2 transfer articulation. Courses to be selected for  the Mechatronics curriculum will be updated to provide students with hands-on experience in industrial controls,  manufacturing systems design, integration, and evaluation in view of environmental and safety concerns. Also, new courses may be added to enhance student learning outcomes and/or better meet industry needs based on various demand indicators.  

  • Will this program replace or enhance any existing program(s) or track(s) within an existing program?*
  • If yes, please specify. Include the projected faculty/ student in major ratio
  • Is there a specialized accrediting agency related to this program?*
  • If yes, identify the agency
    ETAC-ABET
    ETAC-ABET
  • Do you plan to seek accreditation?*
  • If yes, explain your plans for accreditation. If no, explain your rationale for not seeking accreditation*

    The program has to have at least some graduates before we start the accreditation process.  It is percieved that the program could go for accreditation in the 4 th year.  

  • Attach the SACS Faculty Roster Form in the Proposal Toolbox . Faculty resources shall be demonstrated to be adequate and appropriate for the proposed program. The number of faculty should meet external standards where appropriate. The qualifications of faculty will support the objectives and curriculum of the proposed program.

  • Access to the qualitative and quantitative library resources must be appropriate for the proposed program and should meet recognized standards for study at a particular level or in a particular field where such standards are available. Adequacy of electronic access, library facilities, and human resources to service the proposed program in terms of students and faculty will be considered. Physical facilities and instructional equipment must be adequate to support a high quality program. The proposal must address the availability of classroom, laboratory, and office space as well as any equipment needs.

  • Describe the library resources available to support this program. You may attach any documentation provided to SACS*

    Our Engineering Technology programs have dedicated annual funds to purchase books, CDs, subscribe to professional journals and magazines.Library funds are also is used to purchase specialized search and datbase systems that could be used by different departments. An example is Ashby’s Materials data base system purchased with the Library funds.

    The Library provides a number of services in support of academic units.Some of these services are described as follows:

    Blackboard and the Library

    Enhance your course by integrating library resources and services into your Blackboard page. Get a librarian involved or link to pre-existing resources.
    Collection Materials Request

    The Collection Materials Request allows departments to order new materials for the library.
    Course Reserves

    Request that the library place materials on reserve for your class.
    Information Literacy

    Helpful tools to integrate information literacy learning outcomes into your curriculum and classroom assignments.
    Library Instruction

    Steely Library offers a variety of instructional services designed to help faculty and their students take advantage of the increasingly complex and sophisticated information systems that make up today's libraries.
    Library Liaisons

    The Steely Library liaison program serves as a communications vehicle between the library and the NKU academic departments. This page provides a list of library departmental liaisons and their contacts.

    • If the library doesn't own something you need, we can get it for you here.

    University Library Advisory Committee

    The ULAC was formed in the fall of 2001 to provide feedback and input regarding departmental library materials allocations and to act as a communications conduit between the Library administration and the teaching faculty.
    University Records Management

    Services for managing university records.

  • Describe the physical facilities and instructional equipment available to support this program*

    We plan to use current Engineering Technology facilities and instructional equipments dedicated to Engineering Technoology to support this program.

     

  • Clearly state the admission, retention, and completion standards designed to encourage high quality*

    The same admission, retention and completion standards applied to the existing EGT programs will apply to the Mechatronics Engineering Technology.  Please refer to the catolog for more details.

  • Clearly state the degree completion requirements for the program*

    Students will be required to complete the 128 credit hours of courses listed in the Mechatronics attached curriculum file.

  • Provide the following information for the program and for each concentration (some categories may not apply to all programs):

  • Total number of hours required for degree (incuding General Education credits)*
    128
    128
  • Number of hours in degree program core*
    80
    80
  • Number of hours in concentration*
    21
    21
  • Number of hours in guided electives*
    0
    0
  • Number of hours in free electives*
    0
    0
  • Delivery Method*
  • Alternative Delivery Mode Formats (Check all that apply)*
    Does the program use alternative learning formats (e.g. distance learning, technology-enhanced instruction, evening/weekend classes, accelerated courses)?
  • Describe how the proposed program will articulate with related programs in the state*

    We intend that the proposed program here with Cincinnati State Technical and Community College will serve as a model for future articulation with related programs at KCTCS.

    It should describe the extent to which student transfer has been explored and coordinated with other institutions.

  • Attach all draft articulation agreements related to this proposed program in the Proposal Toolbox .

  • Provide Catalog Program Description:*

    A draft pathway with Cincinnati State Community and Technical College is attached to this proposal.

  • List courses under the appropriate curricular headings, fill in the table provided here [link to resource document to be provided] and attach in Proposal Toolbox . Then follow the directions below to create proposed curriculum in Proposal.

    Prospective Curriculum Field

    Step 1

    There are two options to add courses for proposed changes: "Add Course" and "Import Course." For courses that already are in the catalog, click on "Import Course" and find the courses needed. For new classes that are in the Curriculog Approval Process click on "Add Course"-- a box will open asking you for the Prefix, Course Number and Course Title.

    Step 2

    Click on  "View Curriculum Schema." Click on "Add Core" which will be the header for your course groups of the program. After creating the different sections you can proceed to assign courses in each header by clicking on "Add Courses" this will bring up the list of courses available from Step 1. Select the courses you wish to add and reorder as needed by dragging courses. For removing courses click on the .

    Commonly used headers: Degree Requirements, Core Courses, Electives.

  • Prospective Curriculum*
  • Describe planned alternative methods of program delivery*
    On campus
    On campus

  • Complete the following only if the proposed program is an advanced practice doctorate:

  • Describe how the doctorate builds upon the reputation and resources of the existing master’s degree program in the field

    NA

  • Explain the impact of the proposed program on undergraduate education at the institution

    NA

    Within the explanation, note specifically if new undergraduate courses in the field will be needed.
  • List and discuss the nature and appropriateness of available clinical sites

    NA

    Supply letters of commitment from each clinical site that specifies the number of students to be accommodated and identifies other academic programs that also use the facilities.

  • Supply letters of commitment from each clinical site that specifies the number of students to be accommodated and identifies other academic programs that also use the facilities.

  • Program Demand/Unnecessary Duplication

  • Proposed programs must respond to the needs of the academy and to larger economic and social environments. Thus, the institution must demonstrate demand for the proposed program. All proposed programs must address student demand. Programs must also address either employer demand or academic disciplinary needs.

    Student Demand:

  • Clearly describe all evidence of student demand*

    The main source of information for mechatronics professionals came from a need assessment survey conducted by CSTCC and NKU.  The survey was distributed to industry with the aid of Advantage Kentucky Alliance. The 14 survey participants represented a significant group of companies that would employ graduates in the Northern Kentucky and the Southern Ohio regions. Currently a Mechatronics Engineering Technology (either at B.S. or A.S. levels) is not offered in these areas. The survey shows very clearly the need of mechatronics professionals, as employers meet their engineering needs by in-house training.  It also indicates that companies favor the adoption of formal education programs, in order to increase the availability graduates in this field.

    Typically in the form of surveys of potential students and/or enrollments in related programs at the institution.
  • Provide evidence of student demand at the regional, state, and national levels*

    Survey results

    a)    Characteristics of the surveyed companies
    Companies surveyed are mostly medium to large sized (50% with more than 500 employees) and are primarily dedicated to manufacturing (57.1%).  

    b)    The role of Mechatronics in the surveyed companies
    88.8% of the companies use mechatronics on a regular basis. Also, they unanimously  emphasize the importance of the practical aspects of the academic training, in line with the applied engineering education philosophy.

    c)    Mechatronics Personnel Needs and Preferred Sources
    The survey conducted by NKU and CSTCC indicated that in the next 5 years, 84.7% of respondents anticipate the hiring (each one) of 1 to 15 mechatronics professionals and 7.7% will hire 16 to 50. Also, 28.6% of the employers train professionals in house and the same amount recruit employees from colleges or universities.

  • Identify the applicant pool and how they will be reached*

    Applicants will be reached through their employers, and post secondary recruitments.   We plan on a set of actions to increase high-school students’ awareness on STEM disciplines, as well as to attract students from minority groups to the mechatronics program, within NKY and Southern Ohio areas.  Recruiting of non-traditional and underrepresented student’s groups will have priority.  Those initiatives include:

    • Host Women in Trades, Technology and Science Workshops (IWITT)
    • Dual Enrollment Courses offered in grade 12:
    • CIT105 – OSHA 10 General Industry Safety
    • EMET150 – Introduction to Control and Robotics        
    • STEM Summer Camps for secondary students
    • Mechatronics Institutes for underrepresented students in STEM disciplines, including females and minorities, and non-traditional students
  • Describe the student recruitment and selection process*

    The student recruitment and selection process will be similar to the existing procedures followed by NKU admission office. 

  • Identify the primary feeders for the program*

    Primary feeders to this program are from:

    • Cincinnati State Technical and Community College.
    • Other community colleges
    • High schools in NKY & southern Ohio
  • Provide any evidence of a projected net increase in total student enrollments to the campus as a result of the proposed program*

    We expect to have an increase in the students’ enrollments as the new MET program is offered. According to data provided by the NKU Registrar office, over 1000 students who apply for admission request information in regard to engineering related fields.

    The Need Assessment survey conducted for MET, indicates that 84.7% of respondents anticipate hiring (each employer surveyed) 1 to 15 mechatronics professionals and 7.7% will hire 16 to 50 in the next 5 years.

  • Complete the Projected Student Demand Estimate for the first five years of the program [link to resource document to be provided] and attach in Proposal Toolbox .

    Employer Demand:

  • Clearly describe evidence of employer demand*

    Survey results showed:

    a) The survey conducted by NKU and CSTCC indicated that in the next 5 years, 84.7% of respondents anticipate the hiring (each one) of 1 to 15 mechatronics professionals and 7.7% will hire 16 to 50. Also, 28.6% of the employers train professionals in house and the same amount recruit employees from colleges or universities.

    b) Employers Expectations from Mechatronics Education
    Most employers (92.9%) agree that formal education programs can accelerate the qualification of individuals as mechatronics professionals. All of them also agree that a properly designed Mechatronics program can provide the skills required for successful employment of individuals dedicated to the mechatronics area. We can also conclude that typically individuals who became mechatronics technicians went through on-the-job training programs to maintain job competency.

    Such evidence may include employer surveys, current labor market analyses, and future human resources projections. Where appropriate, evidence should demonstrate employers’ preferences for graduates of the proposed program over persons having alternative existing credentials and employers’ willingness to pay higher salaries to graduates of the proposed program.
  • Describe the types of jobs available for graduates, average wages for these jobs, and the number of anticipated openings for each type of jobs at the regional, state, and national levels*

    Since mechatronics discipline is fairly new, there is no regional and/or federal classification of related jobs available.  Base on our inquiries to NKY Chamber of Commerce, the following data was provided for comparable job positions.



    Using the same criteria, data from the U.S. Department of Labor, shows the following:

  • Academic Disciplinary Needs:

  • Clearly describe all evidence justifying a new program based on changes in the academic discipline or other academic reasons*

    The need of this program at NKU is justified by the data provided above. The program supports develpment and implimentationm of a multidisciplinary B.S. in Mechatronics Engineering Technology (MET) program congruent with the needs of industry in the Northern Kentucky / Southern Ohio regions. This is a new 4 year B.S. program with a 2+2 articulation involving NKU and Cincinnati State Technical and Community College (CSTCC).

  • If the proposed program is an advanced practice doctorate explain the new practice or licensure requirements in the profession and/or requirements by specialized accrediting agencies that necessitate a new doctoral program

    NA

  • Similar programs:

  • A new program may serve the same potential student population, the proposed program must be sufficiently different from existing programs in the state or access to existing programs must be sufficiently limited to warrant initiation of a new program.

    Identify similar programs in other Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) states and in the nation.

    If similar programs exist in Kentucky,

  • Does the proposed program differ from existing programs?*
  • If yes, please explain

    Currently Mechatronics Engineering Technology (either at B.S. or A.S. levels) is not offered in either the Northern Kentucky or the Southern Ohio regions. In the state of Kentucky there is no Mechatronics Engineering Technology program at the B.S. level. The closest related offers in the tri-state region (KY, OH, IN) are described below:

  • Does the proposed program serve a different student population from existing programs?*
    (i.e., students in a different geographic area)
  • If yes, please explain
  • Is access to existing programs limited?*
  • If yes, please explain
  • Is there excess demand for existing similar programs?*
  • If yes, please explain
  • Will there be collaboration between the proposed program and existing programs?*
  • If yes, please explain the collaborative arrangements with existing programs

    The courses in the MET curriculum will be selected from existing courses in Engineering Technology B.S. degree programs at Northern Kentucky University (NKU), as well as those that support the associate degree programs at CSTCC for the 2+2 transfer articulation. Courses to be selected for  the Mechatronics curriculum will be updated to provide students with hands-on experience in industrial controls,  manufacturing systems design, integration, and evaluation in view of environmental and safety concerns. Also, new courses may be added to enhance student learning outcomes and/or better meet industry needs based on various demand indicators.  

  • If no, please explain why there is no proposed collaboration with existing programs

    NA

  • Cost and Funding of the Proposed Program

  • The resource requirements and planned sources of funding of the proposed program must be detailed in order to assess the adequacy of the resources to support a quality program. This assessment is to ensure that the program will be efficient in its resource utilization and to assess the impact of this proposed program on the institution’s overall need for funds.

  • Will this program require additional resources?*
  • If yes, provide a brief summary of additional resources that will be needed to implement this program over the next five years
  • Will this program impact existing programs and/or organizational units within your institution?*
  • If yes, please describe the impact

  • Provide adequate documentation to demonstrate sufficient return on investment to the state to offset new costs and justify approval for the proposed program.

    If this is an advanced practice doctorate, provide assurance that funding for the program will not impair funding of any existing program at any other public university.

  • Cost/Funding Explanation

  • Complete the Funding Sources, by year of program and Breakdown of Budget Expenses/Requirements tables for the first five years of the proposed program [link to resource document to be provided] and provide an explanation of how the institution will sustain funding needs, attach document in Proposal Toolbox. *The total funding and expenses in the table should be the same, or explain sources(s) of additional funding for the proposed program.

  • Program Review and Assessment
  • Describe program evaluation procedures for the proposed program*

    This program be under ETAC-ABET accreditation.  ABET - accredited programs have to provide proof that a collegiate program meets standards essential to producing graduated ready to enter the workforce.  As part of the accreditation, assessment of courses and their continuous improvement is part of the periodic review.

    These procedures may include evaluation of courses and faculty by students, administrators, and departmental personnel as appropriate. Program review procedures shall include standards and guidelines for the assessment of student outcomes implied by the program objectives and consistent with the institutional mission.

  • For each assessment method, please provide direct indicators of achievement of program-level student learning outcomes and frequency of data collection:

  • Which components will be evaluated?*

    For the extisting Engineering Technology programs we have established performance measures for each of the student learning outcomes.  The following is an example of the rubric used to assess the feedback received from selected courses.

  • When will the components be evaluated?*

    A selected number of courses in the program will be assessed each semester, based on a rotation schedule.   Feedback from these courses will be provided by faculty and will be analyzed annually.

  • When will the data be collected?*

    After the end of each semester.

  • How will the data be collected?*

    Please refer to the attached EGT course outcome assessment template document.

  • What will be the benchmarks and/or targets to be achieved?*

    Targets for most of the meaurseable outcomes will be set at 70% and above for student knowledge of the subject matter as per the Likert scale.

  • What individuals or groups will be responsible for data collection?*
    Program faculty and Program Director
    Program faculty and Program Director
  • How will the data and findings be shared with faculty?*
    During bi-weekly discipline meetings the results of assessments will be discussewd and subsequently shared with everyone in the program.
    During bi-weekly discipline meetings the results of assessments will be discussewd and subsequently shared with everyone in the program.
  • How will the data be used for making programmatic improvements?*

    The results of the data analysis and continuous improvement action items will have to be shared with our Industrial Advisory Committee. With their approval of the action items and any modifications taken under advisement the program changes will take place. 

  •  

  • What are the measures of teaching effectiveness?*

    Achiement of the performance targets (for course student learning outcomes).

  • What efforts to improve teaching effectiveness will be pursued based on these measures?*

    As the result of our course assessment and continuous improvement report, we will know what outcome in the assessed course have been met, partially met, or not met.  Course outcomes that are partially met or not met will serve as indicators that the faculty may need to take some professional development measures.

  • What are the plans to evaluate students’ post-graduate success?*

    ABET requires each program to document the acheivement of objectives published by the university.  To measure the level of acheivement of program objectives, alumini are surveyed every 3 to 4 years and the results are analyzed.

  • Attachment List
  • Attached
  • Attached*
  • Attached
  • Attached
  • Attached

  • User Tracking

    Help: Show Original: This option displays the proposal as it appeared at launch. No markup will be visible on the form. There will be no differentiation between fields that contain imported content and content that was created or selected by the originator by hand.

    Help: Show Current: This option displays the proposal as it appears currently. No markup will be visible on the form. There will be no differentiation between fields that contain imported content and content that was created or selected by the originator by hand.

    Help: Show Current with Markup: This option displays the proposal with all of its current content marked to show different editors. Text fields that include imported content are indicated by a blue highlight, and may also include additional changes within, indicated by each editor’s unique color. Fields containing selects, checkboxes, radio buttons, or widgets (such as the curriculum) provide an activity log above the field, indicating each editor’s selection and unique color.

    Comments

    You have not saved your changes to all the assessment fields you edited. You have the following options:

    • Click "Save All Changes" now to save every change you made
    • Click "Abandon Changes" to destroy all unsaved changes
    • Click "Cancel" to continue working on assessments and save each field individually

    What would you like to do?

      You must be logged in, in order to approve.

      Please upload the form that you just printed and signed.

      This will be used as your signature to sign this proposal upon approval.


      Listed below are the symbols and colors utilized in Curriculum:

      • = has not made a decision
      • = approved
      • = rejected
      • = held
      • = suspended
      • = cancelled
      • = multiple decisions
      • = task
      • = mine
      • = stuck
      • = urgent, out of date import source
      x

      #{title}

      #{text}

      x
      warning

      #{title}

      #{text}

      x
      warning

      #{title}

      #{text}